Guidelines

USPSTF expands criteria for lung cancer screening


 

Advocacy needed

When approached for comment, Jianjun Zhang, MD, PhD, from the department of thoracic/head and neck medical oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, said he supports the new guidelines, and they will lower mortality. “The data are pretty strong overall,” he said in an interview.

Although the uptake of screening is currently very low, he pointed out that, even if uptake remains the same, more lives will be saved because eligibility has been expanded. “More people will be getting screened, so it’s a start,” he said.

Aside from factors such as insurance and access, another problem involves primary care. “Time is very limited in primary care,” he said. “You have about 15 minutes, and it can be really hard to fit everything into a visit. Screening may get left out or may only get a brief mention.”

Advocacy is needed, Dr. Zhang pointed out. “Breast cancer has strong voices and advocacy, and people are more aware of mammography,” he said. “The information is disseminated out into the community. We need the same for lung cancer.”

Dr. Zhang emphasized that, even with the expanded criteria, many individuals will still be missed. “There are other risk factors besides smoking,” he said. “About 10% of lung cancers occur in never-smokers.”

Other risk factors include a family history of lung cancer, exposure to certain materials and chemicals, working in the mining industry, and genetics.

“We will move on to more personalized screening at some point,” he said. “But right now, we can’t make it too complicated for patients and doctors. We need to concentrate on increasing screening rates within these current criteria.”

The updated guidelines have been given a B recommendation, meaning the USPSTF recommends that clinicians provide the service to eligible patients, there is at least fair evidence that this service improves important health outcomes, and benefits outweigh harms.

The USPSTF is an independent, voluntary body. The U.S. Congress mandates that the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality support the operations of the USPSTF. All members of the USPSTF receive travel reimbursement and an honorarium for participating in USPSTF meetings. The original article lists relevant financial relationships of task force members. Dr. Zhang has received grants from Johnson & Johnson and Merck, and adversary/consulting/honoraria fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GenePlus, Innovent, OrigMed, and Roche.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Customized chemotherapy did not improve survival in early NSCLC
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Model could reduce some disparities in lung cancer screening
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
‘Unprecedented’ long-term survival after immunotherapy in pretreated NSCLC
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
FDA approves first drug that protects against chemo-induced myelosuppression
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
X-ray vision: Using AI to maximize the value of radiographic images
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
How has the pandemic affected rural and urban cancer patients?
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
FDA approves cemiplimab-rwlc for NSCLC with PD-L1 expression
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Researchers identify four small cell lung cancer subtypes and their best therapies
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Study: Shared decision-making in lung cancer screening needs work
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Pembrolizumab SCLC indication withdrawn in U.S.
MDedge Hematology and Oncology