Latest News

Oncologists in malpractice suits: Less than other specialties


 

Murdering psychopath

Some oncologists weighed in on what they felt was the worst experience of being sued.

“Mental anguish, knowing that I did nothing wrong,” said one physician. Another reported that it was a feeling of being “inadequate and totally alone.”

Another oncologist commented that the “depositions from lawyers implied that I was worse than a murdering psychopath. My reputation was permanently damaged.”

However, the vast majority of oncologists (88%) did not believe that the lawsuit negatively affected their career, which was similar to physicians in general. That said, many did complain about the ongoing requirement to report the lawsuit to the credentialing committee, even if it was dismissed, and then having to pay increased malpractice premiums. “I still need to document this episode every single time I apply for any medical position, even more than 29 years after I was dismissed from the case,” said one respondent.

When asked if they would do anything differently, many oncologists (42%) said no, they would not have done anything differently. This is similar to the responses from physicians in general and with 2019 responses from oncologists. However, 15% of the respondents said that in retrospect, they would not have taken on that patient to begin with.

Some oncologists noted that they would have been more conscientious in relaying the information to the referring physician. Evan Lyman, an associate attorney at Voute, Lohrfink, McAndrew, Meisner & Roberts, LLP, in White Plains, N.Y., pointed out that a common reason for lawsuits is a slip-up of communication between the specialist and the referring physician.

Oncologists who had been sued have some insights to offer to colleagues, should they find themselves in a similar situation.

“Only answer with short and precise statements,” wrote one oncologist. “Attend all the depositions as much as you can; they are more likely to fabricate or exaggerate if you are not sitting in the room.”

Another physician said to base “everything on the medical record and do not answer hypothetical questions.”

“Document all interactions with patients as if a jury will be reading them, word by word,” said one respondent.

As for the public or patients, oncologists had this message: “malpractice suits should be rarely launched and only when gross errors can be absolutely proven.”

Another oncologist pointed out that communication is key. “Speak to the physicians against whom you have distrust. Lots of things could be cleared by good communication.”

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Spam filter failure: Selling physician emails equals big $$
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Physician gender pay gap isn’t news; health inequity is rampant
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
More Americans skipping medical care because of cost, survey says
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Chicago oncologist charged with insider trading
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Medicaid implements waivers for some clinical trial coverage
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
‘This makes no sense’: Florida oncologist charged with prescription and insurance fraud
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Physicians react: Should docs lose their licenses for spreading false COVID information?
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Ways to make sure 2022 doesn’t stink for docs
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
What docs don’t know about the Disabilities Act can hurt them and patients
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
10 things not to do in a medical board hearing
MDedge Hematology and Oncology