Latest News

Is this the most controversial issue in early breast cancer treatment?


 

Treating individual patients

When it comes to making treatment decisions for individual patients, Dr. Winer said he has a “conversation with people about what the results of the study showed and what [he believes] that they need.”

For patients whose Oncotype DX score is in the “very low range, I do not recommend chemotherapy,” he said, preferring instead to use endocrine therapy for ovarian function suppression.

For women with a more intermediate score, “I explain that I don’t think we have an answer and that, if they would want to take the most traditional and conservative path, it would be to get chemotherapy.

“But I’m certainly not rigid about my recommendations, and I’m particularly open” to ovarian function suppression for a premenopausal woman with an Onctyope DX score of 20 and two positive nodes who does not have “other adverse features.”

“Ultimately, what pushes me in one direction or another,” Dr. Winer said, aside from number of positive nodes or the size of the tumor, “is the patient’s preferences.”

This was a theme taken up by Kim Sabelko, PhD, vice-president of scientific strategy and programs at Susan G. Komen, Dallas.

The results from RxPONDER and similar studies are “really interesting,” as researchers are “working out how to individualize treatment,” and that it is not a matter of “one size fits all.”

“We need to understand when to use chemotherapy and other drugs, and more importantly, when not to, because we don’t want to overtreat people who don’t necessarily need these drugs,” she commented.

Dr. Sabelko emphasized that treatment decisions “should be shared” between the patient and their doctor, and she noted that there “will be some people who are going to refuse chemotherapy for different reasons.”

These clinical trial results help clinicians to explain the risks and benefits of treatment options, but the treatment decision should be taken “together” with the patient, she emphasized.

Dr. Gnant has relationships with Sandoz, Amge, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Nanostring, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, TLC Pharmaceuticals, and Life Brain. Dr. Loibl has relationships with AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Eirgenix, GSK, Gilead, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Medscape, Puma, Roche, Samsung, Seagen, VM Scope, and GBG Forschungs.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Pages

Recommended Reading

HD201 equivalent to referent trastuzumab in ERBB2-positive early BC
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Metastatic BC: Adding pertuzumab to trastuzumab+chemotherapy prolongs survival in the real world
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Family history of breast cancer increases likelihood of dense breast in premenopausal women
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Real-world evidence supports use of ribociclib+letrozole in males with HR-positive/HER2-negative BC
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
HER2-negative early BC: Subset of patients may benefit from anthracycline-containing chemotherapy
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Pretreatment circulating reproductive hormones predict treatment response in breast cancer
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Avoiding delay in AHT may improve survival in HR-positive, ERBB2-negative early BC
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Breast density linked to familial breast cancer risk
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Clinical Edge Journal Scan Commentary: Breast Cancer April 2022
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
False-positive breast cancer screening likely over 10-year period
MDedge Hematology and Oncology