From the Journals

Colorectal cancer: Younger patients fare worse


 

FROM JAMA NETWORK OPEN

Data support individualized treatment

“We were surprised to find that patients with early-onset metastatic colorectal cancer had worse survival outcome, compared to older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer,” Dr. Xie said, in an interview. “On the other hand, we were not surprised to find unique adverse-event patterns in patients with early-onset metastatic colorectal cancer.”

For clinicians, “The take home message is that we should adopt individualized management approaches [regarding] cancer-direct treatments and treatment-related side effects in patients with early-onset metastatic colorectal cancer,” said Dr. Xie. However, more research is needed in the form of prospective and interventional studies to address treatment-related side effects and to develop novel and personalized therapeutics for patients with early-onset metastatic colorectal cancer, Dr. Xie added.

Early-onset cancer concerns persist

“The increasing shift in early colon cancers demands better understanding, in particular as we attempt a more patient-focused approach to treatments,” said David A. Johnson, MD, chief of gastroenterology at Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, in an interview. “Clearly, genetic amplifications and oncogene mutations play an essential role in tumorigenesis and tumor progression, but data on specifics are needed.”

With regard to the current study, “it makes sense that the pathways to CRC development and progression at least in part play a role in age-related cancers,” said Dr. Johnson, who was not involved in the study.

The clinical implications from the study are that early-onset CRC “can be aggressive and progressive,” Dr. Johnson said. “Younger patients need to recognize the earlier ages for beginning CRC screening, age 45 years for those at average risk, and certainly report any new sign or symptom to their care provider, in particular blood in the stool.”

As for additional research, “The oncogenetic markers will be helpful in guiding treatment approaches to be more individual specific, rather than just disease focused,” Dr. Johnson said. “The role of the gut microbiome will need evaluation as it relates to these oncogenetic factors,” he noted. Considerations include not only the potential influence of the gut microbiome on the expression of these factors, but also the impact of the gut microbiome on the chemotherapeutic response, as has been evident with checkpoint inhibitors, he added.

The study was supported by a Moffitt Support Grant to Dr. Xie and the University of South Florida Continuing Medical Education Funding. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose. Dr. Johnson had no relevant financial conflicts to disclose.

Pages

Recommended Reading

2023 Rare Diseases Report: Cancers
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
NORD: Making Progress Through Collaboration
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
ACS officer provides ASCO highlights: Targeting hidden cancer, AI in oncology
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Cancer drug shortages spur worry, rationing, and tough choices
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: Reflecting on 2 Decades of Clinical Advancements
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Drugmakers are abandoning cheap generics, and now U.S. cancer patients can’t get meds
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
DEI training gives oncology fellows more confidence
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Huge underuse of germline testing for cancer patients
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
CBSM phone app eases anxiety, depression in cancer patients
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Multiprong strategy makes clinical trials less White
MDedge Hematology and Oncology