News

CMS Issues Final Rule on Accountable Care Organizations


 

Use of electronic health records is no longer a condition for participating in an accountable care organization, according to the Oct. 20 final rule that will govern how ACOs are constructed and how they will be paid. The change is just one of many in the long-awaited regulation.

The 696-page final rule contains many significant changes that were made in response to the 1,320 comments the agency received on its proposed rule, issued in late March and published April 7 in the Federal Register.

Many physician groups and hospitals complained about various aspects of the proposed rule. They met repeatedly with the agency, CMS Administrator Don Berwick said during a press briefing.

"Thanks to the generous input of ideas from so many Americans, we’ve been able to fine-tune and improve these rules to better meet the needs of a range of stakeholders," Dr. Berwick said.

"When folks see the rules and see the many changes, they will see that CMS listened," Jonathan Blum, CMS deputy administrator and director of the Center for Medicare, said during the briefing.

In the proposed rule, half of primary care physicians in an ACO had to meet the meaningful use criteria for EHRs by the second year of what will be 3-year contracts with the CMS. Under the final rule, EHRs will not be required, but instead be heavily weighted as a measure of quality of care.

The final rule also pushes back the program’s starting dates. Originally, the CMS envisioned a start date of January 2012 for organizations that wanted to participate.

Now, the program will be established by January 2012 with the initial agreements starting in April or July of that year. The first performance "year" will be 18 or 21 months in length, rather than 12 months.

Under the final rule, there are two components to the ACO program: the Shared Savings Program and the Advanced Payment Model.

To be eligible to participate in the Shared Savings Program, ACOs must be able to be held accountable for at least 5,000 beneficiaries a year for each of the 3 years of the agreement. Only certain parties may sponsor an ACO: physicians in group practices, individual practitioner networks, or hospitals. That list was expanded in the final rule to include collaborations between Rural Health Clinics and Federally Qualified Health Centers.

To earn shared savings, ACO participants will have to report on measures that span four quality domains: quality standards, care coordination, preventive health, and at-risk populations. The final rule substantially reduces the number of quality measures, from 65 in five domains to 33 in four domains. In the first year, ACOs that are sharing savings only will be required to report on these measures to receive payment. In the second year, they will need to meet pay-for-performance standards on 25 of the measures, growing to 32 measures in the third year.

In the proposed rule, ACOs could only share savings in the third year of the 3-year agreement. Now, they can share beginning in the first. The CMS says this will help less-experienced organizations gain know-how before they more fully participate in the program. Fuller participation would have ACOs sharing losses, as well.

The savings-only route has ACOs splitting up to 50% of the savings with the CMS. If an ACO chooses to also share losses, it will get up to 60% of the savings. Under the proposed rule, the CMS could withhold 25% of pay-for-performance bonuses, but that has been removed from the final rule.

Also, under the proposed rule, ACOs would only start sharing in the savings after they had passed a minimum threshold set by the CMS. That threshold was established to ensure that the savings weren’t just random, Dr. Berwick said. The minimum still exists under the final rule, but now, if the savings aren’t just due to a random variation in costs, the ACO can share in savings starting with the first dollar, Dr. Berwick said.

The final rule made some changes to how Medicare beneficiaries would be assigned to ACOs, noting that "determination of whether an Accountable Care Organization was responsible for coordinating care for a beneficiary will be based on whether that person received most of their primary care services from the organization."

To spur participation in the Shared Savings Program, the CMS also announced that it would make money available to physicians, hospitals, and others for major capital investments under the Advanced Payment Model.

This model will pay a portion of future savings to eligible participants. Once they begin sharing in savings, they will have to repay the money. According to the final rule, eligible ACOs will either receive an upfront, fixed payment; an upfront, variable payment; or a monthly payment of varying amount depending on of the number of Medicare beneficiaries historically attributed to the ACO. More information on eligibility and requirements is at the agency’s innovation center’s Web site.

Pages

Recommended Reading

United States Earns 'B' on Palliative Care Report Card
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Docs Seek Changes to SGR Fix Plan
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Companies Seek Expanded Access to Genetic Specimens
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
MedPAC Votes to Ditch SGR
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
IOM Urges Affordable Essential Benefits Package
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Clinical Innovation
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
California Teen Tanning Ban Signed Into Law
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Petitions Pile Up for Supreme Court Review of ACA
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Megace Lawsuit Claims Right to Talk to Off-Label Prescribers
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Drug Shortages Increasingly Take Toll on Care
MDedge Hematology and Oncology

Related Articles