News

Noncarriers in BRCA Families Dodge Breast Cancer Risk

View on the News

Reassuring Results

"It is reassuring that the results of the study by Kurian et al. are consistent with the results of the prospective cohort studies from clinic-based series," said Dr. Mark Robson.

However, like those studies, this study cannot exclude the possibility that women who do not carry their family’s BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation might remain at slightly increased risk for breast cancer compared with women in the general population. Even so, the magnitude of that potential risk "seems to be insufficient to mandate a distinct clinical response," he said.

Dr. Robson is at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, both in New York. He reported no financial conflicts of interest. These remarks were taken from his editorial accompanying the report of Dr. Kurian and colleagues (J. Clin. Oncol. 2011 Oct. 31 [doi:10.1200/JCO.2011.37.6483]).


 

FROM THE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY

Women who don’t carry their family’s BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation showed no increase in breast cancer risk in a study of 3,047 population-based families reported online Oct. 31 in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

"These results support the standard clinical practice of advising noncarriers that they do not have any increase in breast cancer risk attributable to the family-specific BRCA mutation and, in the absence of other strong risk factors, should follow general population guidelines for breast cancer screening," said Dr. Allison W. Kurian of Stanford (Calif.) University and her associates.

Some recent studies have suggested that noncarriers of a family-specific mutation may have a two- to fivefold increase in risk of developing breast cancer, compared with the general population. While lower than the 5- to 20-fold increase in risk for carriers of the mutation, this rate would still be high enough to warrant breast cancer surveillance. Other studies have found no increase in risk among noncarriers.

To clarify the issue, Dr. Kurian and her colleagues assessed breast cancer risk using population-based cancer registries in the United States, Australia, and Canada. They identified 3,047 families in which one woman (the proband) was diagnosed as having breast cancer at a relatively young age, in most cases during 1996-2000, and she and her female first-degree relatives underwent genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.

Women in all three countries showed a similar prevalence of the mutations, similar rates of breast and ovarian cancer, and similar ages of onset for the malignancies. Overall, 160 families had BRCA1 mutations and 132 had BRCA2 mutations, the investigators reported (J. Clin. Oncol. 2011 Oct. 31 [doi:10.1200.JCO.2010.34.4440]).

Among noncarriers of family-specific mutations, the risk of developing breast cancer was not significantly higher than the risk among women in families without any BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. This relative risk was 0.39.

It is possible that previous studies reporting an increased risk in noncarriers have overestimated this risk, because they compared study subjects with women in the general population rather than women whose relatives have breast cancer. The latter group undergoes more frequent screening and consequently has more frequent diagnoses of breast cancer than women in the general population, Dr. Kurian and her associates noted.

Their study, in which 292 families with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations were compared with 2,755 families without such mutations from the same populations, "represents the largest analysis to date of breast cancer risk to noncarriers of family-specific mutations," they added.

The study was supported by the National Cancer Institute, the National Institutes of Health, Cancer Care Ontario, Cancer Prevention Institute of California, and the University of Melbourne. No financial conflicts of interest were reported.

Recommended Reading

BRCA2 Linked to Better Chemo Response in Ovarian Cancer
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
FDA: Increased PAH Risk Seen With Dasatinib
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
AFP Level Predicts Mortality in Hepatitis C-Related Liver Cancer
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Study Supports Altering Surveillance for Barrett's Esophagus
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Screen Carotids After Head and Neck Radiation
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Hysterectomy No Boon in Early-Stage Ovarian Cancer
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Mini X-Ray Device Treats Nonmelanoma Skin Cancers
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Series of Articles on Melanoma Aimed at Informing Policy
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Mammography's Role in Saving Lives Deemed Exaggerated
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
PLCO Trial: Chest Radiograph Screening Fails to Reduce Lung Cancer Mortality
MDedge Hematology and Oncology