Research

Palonosetron Plus 1-Day Dexamethasone for the Prevention of Nausea and Vomiting Due to Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy: Effect of Established Risk Factors on Treatment Outcome in a Phase III Trial

The objectives of this prespecified post hoc analysis were to demonstrate the non-inferiority hypothesis in an adjusted model for known risk factors (age, gender, alcohol consumption, and type of MEC [anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide (AC)–based versus other MEC]) for CINV and to explore the impact on antiemetic outcome of these risk factors.



 

Original research

Palonosetron Plus 1-Day Dexamethasone for the Prevention of Nausea and Vomiting Due to Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy: Effect of Established Risk Factors on Treatment Outcome in a Phase III Trial

Previous Presentation: Presented in part at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Orlando, Florida, May 29–June 2, 2009.
  • Luigi Celio, MD
    ,
  • Angela Denaro, MD,
  • Francesco Agustoni, MD,
  • Emilio Bajetta, MD
  • Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS “Istituto Nazionale Tumori,” Milan, Italy
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.suponc.2011.06.007

Abstract

Background

The non-inferiority of palonosetron plus 1-day versus 3-day dexamethasone in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) due to moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) has been previously demonstrated.

Objective

The objectives of this prespecified post hoc analysis were to demonstrate the non-inferiority hypothesis in an adjusted model for known risk factors (age, gender, alcohol consumption, and type of MEC [anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide (AC)–based versus other MEC]) for CINV and to explore the impact on antiemetic outcome of these risk factors.

Methods

Chemonaive patients (n = 324) with solid tumors were randomized to receive palonosetron 0.25 mg IV plus dexamethasone 8 mg IV on day 1 of chemotherapy or the same regimen followed by oral dexamethasone 8 mg on days 2 and 3. The primary end point was complete response (CR, no emesis and no rescue antiemetics) during the 5-day study period. A modified intention-to-treat approach was used for multivariable analysis.

Results

Non-inferiority of the 1-day regimen was confirmed even after adjusting for risk factors (risk difference −4.4%, 95% CI −14.1% to 5.4%; P = .381). Only age less than 50 years (P = .044) independently predicted a poor outcome of antiemetic treatment. However, most of the younger patients were women (1-day regimen 81.8%, 3-day regimen 88.4%) who underwent AC-based chemotherapy (1-day regimen 61.1%, 3-day regimen 71.0%). There were no significant between-treatment differences in the CR rate according to risk factors.

Conclusion

This analysis confirmed that the 1-day regimen provides a valid treatment option for prevention of CINV in delayed, non-AC-based MEC.

Recommended Reading

Surrogates' Emotions Influence Decisions Made for Critically Ill
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Long-Acting Opioids May Trigger Hypogonadism
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
FDA: Continue Study of Antinerve Growth Factors for Pain
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Identify Depressive Symptoms Early in Breast Cancer Patients
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Study: Myeloma Survival Gains, but QOL Slides
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Late Oral Complications After Head/Neck Radiation 'Underreported'
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Antinausea Gel Not Absorbed at Therapeutic Levels
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Music Interventions Improve Anxiety, Pain in Cancer Patients
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
The Role of Spirituality and Religious Coping in the Quality of Life of Patients With Advanced Cancer Receiving Palliative Radiation Therapy
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Spiritual Well-Being and Quality of Life of Women with Ovarian Cancer and Their Spouses
MDedge Hematology and Oncology