Article

Facilitating quality in oncology


 

You must be the change you wish to see in the world.
– Mahatma Gandhi

In November 2012, the American Society of Clinical Oncology hosted its first annual Quality Care Symposium in San Diego. The attendants and presenters were like-minded individuals who were focused on systematically evaluating and improving cancer care. Throughout the symposium, Donabedian’s structure-process-outcome model was a recurring and unifying framework for evaluating quality metrics. No one questions the importance of improving the quality of care, but many other questions remain: What is quality care? How will it be measured? Will its measurement be comparable across practices? How can small systems that have figured out good solutions to quality care go about reproducing their models of quality care on a larger scale so that we all may benefit?

*Click on the links to the left for PDFs of the full editorial and related articles.

Recommended Reading

States spend little tobacco revenue on prevention
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Doctors support bipartisan SGR repeal bill
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Cancer survival still lower for African Americans
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Bill seeks to keep biologic copays down
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
VIDEO: Happy patients, happy physician practice
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
IOM report addresses global problem of poor-quality drugs
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
SGR fix coming soon? The Policy & Practice Podcast
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Cancer incidence and mortality hit blacks hardest
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Choosing Wisely: More tests questioned in second round
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
NCI trials overhaul eyes community-based biomarker studies
MDedge Hematology and Oncology

Related Articles