Original Report

Self-administration of romiplostim in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia


 

Background Romiplostim increases platelet counts in ITP and is typically injected at clinic visits.

Objective To estimate the efficacy and safety of romiplostim self-administration, we evaluated data from an open-label extension study in a post hoc analysis.

Methods Patients received weekly romiplostim with dose adjustments to target platelet counts of 50-200 x 109/L. Patients with a stable dose and platelet counts of 50-200 x 109/L for 3 or more weeks could begin self-administration if investigators deemed it appropriate, returning to study sites every 4 weeks.

Results Of 292 patients, 239 (82%) initiated self-administration for a median of 74 (Q1-Q3:56-164) weeks. Twenty-eight of the 239 (12%) discontinued self-administration (investigator or sponsor decision: 19, patient request: 6, noncompliance: 3). The median average weekly dose for patients self-administering romiplostim was 4.1 g/kg. The romiplostim dose was adjusted in 40 (17%) of the 239 patients in the first 8 weeks of self-administration; 84 (35%) in the first 6 months. Patients had a platelet response (more than 50 x 109/L) for a mean of 75.1% of weeks. The adverse event (AE) rate was 18.3/100 patient-weeks, with 0.8 serious AEs/100 patient-weeks. Fourteen AEs led to withdrawal; none related to self-administration.

Limitations The analysis was post hoc. Lack of a randomized comparator group may have resulted in differences between patient populations. No distinctions could be made between constant and intermittent self-administration or between adverse events occurring during self-administration or administration at the study site.

Conclusions Patients were able to maintain platelet responses for a mean of 75% of the time without new safety issues while self-administering romiplostim.

To read the full article, click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction.

Recommended Reading

Improving access with a collaborative approach to cancer genetic counseling services: a pilot study
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Minimizing cancer’s impact on bone with denosumab: current and future perspectives
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Hospice usage up but not delivered soon enough, study finds
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
How to begin a survivorship program in your community oncology practice
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Survivorship in the community oncology practice
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
The demands of cancer survivorship: the who, what, when, where, why, and how
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Many women with cancer not told about impaired fertility risk
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Low-grade toxicities take a toll on older cancer patients
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Sulfasalazine may make radiation-induced diarrhea worse
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Use of the JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib in the treatment of patients with myelofibrosis
MDedge Hematology and Oncology