News

Flexible sigmoidoscopy screening reduces colorectal cancer, mortality

View on the News

Procedure’s benefit may be moot

This is the fourth large randomized trial assessing sigmoidoscopy screening in recent years – the others taking place in the United Kingdom, the United States, and Italy – even though the procedure "has all but vanished" here, replaced by screening colonoscopy, Dr. Allan S. Brett said.

And even the benefit of screening colonoscopy may soon become moot, as that invasive procedure is replaced by "a multitarget stool test that identifies several DNA abnormalities associated with colorectal cancer or precancerous adenomas," which is now under investigation. In one large study published earlier this year, this test’s sensitivity was 92% for detecting cancer and 42% for detecting advanced precancerous lesions, and its specificity was 90%, he noted.

Dr. Allan S. Brett is in the department of medicine at the University of South Carolina, Columbia. He reported no financial conflicts of interest. These remarks were taken from his editorial accompanying Dr. Holme’s report (JAMA 2014 312:601-2).


 

FROM JAMA

References

One-time-only screening for colorectal cancer using flexible sigmoidoscopy reduced colorectal cancer incidence by 20% and colorectal cancer–specific mortality by 27% in a Norwegian study involving more than 20,000 adults followed for approximately 11 years, which was published online Aug. 12 in JAMA.

In addition, younger patients aged 50-54 years appeared to benefit at least as much from screening as older patients aged 55-64 years, in what the investigators described as the first randomized controlled trial to assess the benefit of the procedure in this age group. This finding is particularly important given that some national screening recommendations, including those in the United States, advise that colorectal cancer screening be initiated at age 50 rather than at 55, said Dr. Oyvind Holme of Sorlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway, and his associates in the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention (NORCCAP) trial.

NORCCAP is a population-based, randomized controlled study in which 100,210 men and women aged 50-64 years residing in two geographic regions in Norway in 1999-2001 were invited by mail to undergo once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening or flexible sigmoidoscopy plus fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) for colorectal cancer. Virtually no other screening colonoscopies were available outside this trial in Norway at that time, so it was ensured that members of the control group couldn’t be screened on their own, biasing the study results.

The intent-to-treat population comprised 98,792 adults: 10,283 randomly assigned to flexible sigmoidoscopy, 10,289 randomly assigned to flexible sigmoidoscopy plus FOBT, and 78,220 control subjects. Adherence to screening was 63%, with 12,955 of the invited patients attending their screening exam.

After a median follow-up of 11 years, the incidence of colorectal cancer was 112.6 per 100,000 person-years in the screening group, compared with 141.0 in the control group, a 20% difference. Similarly, colorectal cancer–specific mortality was 31.4 per 100,000 person-years in the screening group, compared with 43.1 in the control group, a 27% difference, the investigators reported (JAMA 2014 312:606-15).

Adding FOBT to flexible sigmoidoscopy not only failed to improve colorectal cancer detection, it was actually a deterrent to adherence, and thus may have impeded detection, Dr. Holme and his associates said.

NORCCAP was funded by the Norwegian government, the Norwegian Cancer Society, the Research Council of Norway, The South-East Regional Health Authority, the Fulbright Foundation, Sorlandet Hospital, and the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Holme reported no potential financial conflicts of interest; one of his associates reported ties to Exact Sciences, Olympus, and other companies.

Recommended Reading

Vascular reconstruction may have a role in pancreatic adenocarcinoma resection
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy fails to boost survival
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Everolimus fails to improve HCC survival
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Angiogenic kinase inhibitor receives orphan drug designation for hepatocellular carcinoma
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Vary CRC screening by age, sex, race, ethnicity?
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
TCGA investigators propose four subtypes of gastric cancer
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Stage esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemo
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Gut bacteria populations may predict colon cancers
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Medical consultation rates for surgical cases vary
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Benefits outweigh harms of aspirin therapy
MDedge Hematology and Oncology