From the AGA Journals

Identification of subtypes, mutations in CRC and colon cancer greatly increases survival rates

View on the News

Tumor genotyping should be important in colon cancer treatment

It is now recognized that colon cancer is quite heterogeneous on a genetic level, and the clinical features associated with each of these genetic subtypes are equally heterogeneous. The two current studies addressed the question of whether long-term prognosis differs among these genetic subtypes. Colon tumors were first divided into five distinct categories, based upon a panel of multiple molecular markers. One study analyzed more than 2,700 colon cancers of all stages, whereas the other examined more than 2,700 stage III tumors from a North Central Cancer Treatment Group adjuvant chemotherapy trial.

Similar patterns emerged. Tumors with the least favorable prognosis were the so-called “serrated” tumors that are DNA mismatch-repair (MMR) proficient and are positive for a BRAF mutation. Tumors with deficient MMR (MSI-H), whether sporadic or associated with Lynch syndrome, consistently exhibited the most favorable prognosis and highest rates of long-term survival.

These studies provide strong evidence that links survival with specific tumor genotypes, regardless of stage or treatment, and establish the significance of molecular genotyping for prognostic purposes. There are other important reasons to perform tumor genotyping, including the identification of unrecognized Lynch syndrome. However, the therapeutic implications of tumor genotyping remain less clear, as meaningful targeted therapies for each of the specific subgroups are still lacking. In particular, effective targeting of the BRAF oncogene in serrated tumors remains an important priority. More refined molecular classifications are likely to emerge in the future, and the opportunities to offer more precise and personalized approaches to management should increase in parallel.

Dr. Daniel C. Chung is associate professor, department of medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, and director, Hi-Risk Gastrointestinal Cancer Clinic, Massachusetts General Hospital, also in Boston. He had no conflicts of interest.


 

FROM GASTROENTEROLOGY

References

“These findings contribute to a small but growing literature supporting the significance of CRC-subtype classifications defined by combinations of these tumor markers,” the authors noted.

The second study’s results indicate that patients suffering from stage III colon cancer who have MMR-proficient tumors and mutations in BRAF (V600E) or KRAS had shorter survival times than patients whose tumors lacked these specific mutations.

“Defining [CRC] tumor subtypes based upon pathway-driven alterations has the potential to improve prognostication and guide targeted therapy,” wrote Dr. Frank Sinicrope of the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., and his associates.

Investigators collected 2,720 tumor samples from stage III cancer patients and detected mutations in BRAF (V600E) and KRAS using a polymerase chain reaction–based assay, and tumors deficient or proficient in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) via detection of MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 proteins and methylation of the MLH1 promoter. Investigators used a separate sample of tumors, taken from 783 stage III cancer patients, to validate their findings, and employed the Cox proportional hazards model to evaluate associations between tumors and 5-year disease-free survival rates.

Tumors were divided into five subtypes, three of which were MMR proficient – those with BRAFV600E (6.9% of samples), mutations in KRAS (35%), or tumors lacking either BRAFV600E or mutations in KRAS (49%) – and two of which were MMR deficient: the sporadic type (6.8%) with BRAFV600E or hypermethylation of MLH1, and the familial type (2.6%), which lacked BRAFV600E or hypermethylation of MLH1.

The data accumulated by Dr. Sinicrope and his coinvestigators showed that more MMR-proficient tumors with BRAFV600E than MMR-proficient tumors without BRAFV600E or mutations in KRAS were proximal, high grade, N2, and prevalent in female subjects: 76% vs. 33%, 44% vs. 19%, 59% vs. 41%, and 59% vs. 42%, respectively (overall P < .0001).

Furthermore, a “significantly lower proportion” of patients having MMR-proficient tumors with BRAFV600E (HR 1.43; adjusted P = .0065) or mutant KRAS (HR 1.48; adjusted P < .0001) survived disease free for 5 years, compared with those whose MMR-proficient tumors lacked mutations in either gene.

“We found that a biomarker-based classifier can identify prognostically distinct subtypes within stage III colon cancer patients that was externally validated,” the authors wrote, adding that “taken together, our biomarker classifier provides important prognostic information in stage III colon cancers with implications for patient management.”

The investigators for both studies reported no relevant financial disclosures.

dchitnis@frontlinemedcom.com

Pages

Recommended Reading

Endoscopic mucosal resection proves effective, durable for Barrett’s-associated neoplasia
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Palliative tumor removal extends survival
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Docetaxel/oxaliplatin/5-fluorouracil effective in treatment of advanced gastric cancer
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
More activity, less television prolongs life in colorectal Ca
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Immunosuppression not tied to subsequent cancer in IBD with cancer history
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
New agent extends progression-free survival in advanced pancreatic cancer
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
FDA approves lanreotide for GEP-NETs after priority review
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
A feasibility study of dignity therapy in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer actively receiving second-line chemotherapy
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Ramucirumab for advanced gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma in previously treated patients with disease progression
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Small victories add up to paradigm shifts for hard-to-treat tumors
MDedge Hematology and Oncology