News

Implanted phrenic-nerve stimulator improves central sleep apnea

View on the News

More safety, clinical outcomes results needed

This is a really interesting and provocative study that tests a concept that flies in the face of conventional wisdom. In the past, we tried our best to avoid phrenic nerve stimulation when implanting pacemakers or other devices; it was considered a side effect. With the approach studied in this new trial, phrenic-nerve stimulation is the goal.

Dr. Frank Ruschitzka

I see inherent drawbacks with a treatment that requires implantation of a device. Implanted devices never deliver an unmitigated good; there is always a downside. I am very interested in seeing more complete safety data to better judge the potential risks from this treatment. The report from the SERVE-HF trial last year (N Engl J Med. 2015 Sept 17;373[12]:1095-1105), which showed excess mortality from a different treatment for central sleep apnea, further highlighted the importance of fully evaluating safety when treating central sleep apnea.

Another important issue is does the reduction in apnea-hypopnea index seen in this trial translate into a clinically-meaningful benefit? Ultimately that is what is important, but so far it hasn’t been shown. The treatment did, on average, decrease the apnea-hypopnea index, but does it decrease outcomes like hospitalizations or deaths? We need to see is more data specifically in heart failure patients. When judging the value of a device what we want to see are no safety concerns and fewer clinical events.

Dr. Frank Ruschitzka is professor of cardiology and head of the heart failure unit at University Hospital in Zurich. He made these comments in an interview. He had no disclosures.


 

AT HEART FAILURE 2016

References

Phrenic nerve stimulation causes contraction of a patient’s diaphragm that creates negative pressure within the chest cavity in a manner similar to that of natural breathing. The stimulation is adjusted to make it imperceptible to patients, and stimulation does not occur when a patient is standing or sitting, only when lying down. “With positive airway pressure in patients with advanced heart failure you reduce venous return, and when a patient’s heart is sick and depends on preload this can hurt the patient. Phrenic nerve stimulation does the opposite. It contracts the diaphragm and creates negative pressure, so it anything it facilitates venous return,” she explained.

The trial, run at 31 centers, mostly in the United States with the others in Europe, enrolled patients with moderate to severe central sleep apnea with an average apnea-hypopnea index of 45 episodes per hour while sleeping. The average age was 65 years, about 90% of the patients were men, and average body mass index was 31 kg/m2.

In addition to the primary efficacy endpoint of reduced apnea-hypopnea index, the patients on active treatment also showed statistically significant reductions compared with baseline in central apnea episodes and in daytime sleepiness measured on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale and an improvement in the patients’ global assessment of their condition. The changes did not occur in the control patients. In the treated patients central apnea episodes fell from an average of 32 episodes per hour at baseline to an average of 6 central episodes an hour after 6 months on treatment.

Dr. Costanzo is a consultant to and has received research support from Respicardia, the company developing the tested phrenic-nerve stimulation device. Dr. Jessup had no disclosures.

mzoler@frontlinemedcom.com

On Twitter @mitchelzoler

Pages

Recommended Reading

Stem cells show heart failure benefits in phase II trial
MDedge Internal Medicine
DANAMI 3-iPOST: No significant benefit with ischemic postconditioning after STEMI
MDedge Internal Medicine
No rise in serious HF seen in patients taking saxagliptin or sitagliptin
MDedge Internal Medicine
Acute heart failure mortality climbs with severity of peripheral edema
MDedge Internal Medicine
Drilling down on end-of-life health care costs in heart failure
MDedge Internal Medicine
Exercise is protective but underutilized in atrial fib patients
MDedge Internal Medicine
Prompt antidepressant treatment swiftly chops cardiovascular risk
MDedge Internal Medicine
Rhythm control may be best for atrial fib in HFpEF
MDedge Internal Medicine
Guidelines add two new heart failure treatments
MDedge Internal Medicine
Nitroxl prodrug shows promise in acute heart failure
MDedge Internal Medicine