Feature

MACRA final rule exempts many more doctors


 

Physicians who do not have a large Medicare population or who do not bill much to Medicare Part B will get a bit more breathing room to avoid having to participate in MACRA’s Quality Payment Program.

In a final rule posted Oct. 14 that sets out how the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA) will work, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services increased the threshold for inclusion in the new value-based payment program from the initial proposal of physicians who bill Medicare more than $10,000 per year or treat more than 100 Medicare patients per year to those who bill more than $30,000 per year or provide care to more than 100 Medicare patients per year.

However, agency officials noted that it is committed to helping these small and solo practices become active participants in the Quality Payment Program.

Andy Slavitt, acting administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

Andy Slavitt

CMS “heard from physicians in small and rural practices concerned about the impact of the new requirements,” CMS Acting Administrator Andy Slavitt said in a blog post also published Oct. 14.

“We heard these concerns and are taking additional steps to aid small practices, including reducing the time and cost to participate, excluding more small practices, increasing the availability of Advanced APMs [Alternative Payment Models] to small practices, allowing practices to begin participation at their own pace, changing one of the qualifications for participation in Advanced APMs to be practice-based as an alternative to total cost–based, and conducting significant technical support and outreach to small practices using $20 million a year over the next 5 years.”

CMS officials estimate that the new threshold will exclude an estimated 380,000 physicians and health care providers, up from about 225,000 under the initially proposed threshold.

Mr. Slavitt added that with these changes, “we estimate that small physicians will have the same level of participation as that of other practice sizes.”

The flexibility of participation was first announced Sept. 8, in a blog post outlining four options for participation in the Quality Payment Program:

• Option 1: Test the quality payment program in 2017 by submitting data without facing any negative payment adjustments. This will give physicians the year to make sure their processes are in place and ready for broader participation in 2018 and beyond.

• Option 2: Delay the start of the performance period and participate for just part of 2017. Depending on how long a physician delays reporting quality information back to CMS, they could still qualify for a smaller bonus payment.

• Option 3: Participate for the entire calendar year as called for by the law and be eligible for the full participation bonuses.

• Option 4: For those who qualify, participate in an Advanced Alternative Payment Model beginning next year.

That said, under the final rule, those who fail to do the bare minimum and report no data in 2017 will face a 4% pay cut in 2019.

“I am sure that is going to impact some providers,” John Feore, director at Avalere Health, said in an interview. “But with the options, you can report on a very small number of measures, one for each of the categories, for a continuous 90-day period and you will be sort of held harmless [and able] to transition over time into the program.”

Mr. Feore said that did not see any surprises in his initial quick scan of the final rule and that he views the increased flexibility as positive.

“CMS is understanding that MACRA is a pretty substantial change,” he said. “They are calling [2017] a transition year. They are even referring to 2018 as a transition year with more details to come. They are responding to stakeholder concerns that it was a little too much too soon and there is varying degrees of readiness.”

Physician organizations were supportive of the final rule, particularly regarding how it addresses the concerns of small/solo practices.

CMS officials “took a significant step last month to address AMA concerns about the original proposal,” American Medical Association President Andrew W. Gurman, MD, said in a statement. “The final rule includes additional steps to help small and rural practices by raising the low-volume threshold exemption, and practices of all sizes will benefit from reduced MIPS reporting requirements. Our initial review indicates that CMS has been responsive to many concerns raised by the AMA.”

American College of Cardiology President Richard A. Chazal, MD, said in a statement that the organization is “encouraged to see that CMS has made several changes in the final rule based on comments by the clinician community.”

The American College of Rheumatology also expressed support.

“Giving providers the flexibility of multiple options for participation in the first and second years will help ensure a smooth transition to the new payment system, and the continued delivery of quality care to Medicare patients living with rheumatic diseases,” the organization said in a statement. “We also appreciated the broadening of exemptions from the program, which will help to protect small practices that already struggle to keep up with administrative burdens, along with the reduction in the number of required measures to be reported.”

The American Osteopathic Association applauded the flexibility being offered, but found it “disappointing that many of those currently in patient-centered medical homes will still not qualify for [APMs] and opportunities to enter other such value-based models remain limited.”

To that end, CMS officials said that the agency is looking into creating an accountable care organization (ACO) “Track 1 Plus” model that would qualify for as an APM. Currently, ACOs that are in Track 1 share savings but do not assume risk. The agency said that the Track 1 Plus model would have organizations assuming some nominal level of risk that would be smaller, compared with those in the Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) Track 2 and Track 3, as well as those that qualify as Next Generation ACOs. CMS plans to have the ACO Track 1 Plus Model ready for the 2018 reporting year.

The National Association of ACOs expressed disappointment that those ACOs that fall in the Track 1 of the MSSP do not qualify as an APM, but it is “incredibly pleased that CMS recognizes the need for a new model and is taking steps to develop a new MSSP Track 1 Plus,” President and CEO Clif Gaus said in a statement.

More CMS-issued information and educational material about the MACRA final rule can be found here.

gtwachtman@frontlinemedcom.com

Recommended Reading

Here on Earth
MDedge Internal Medicine
Trauma operative training declining for general surgery residents
MDedge Internal Medicine
Four of five health care providers get flu shot
MDedge Internal Medicine
Diagnostic error most common claim against internists
MDedge Internal Medicine
Almost half of health providers will see PQRS pay cut
MDedge Internal Medicine
VIDEO: The ‘artificial’ divide between biology and psychology
MDedge Internal Medicine
CMS assures small-practice doctors they have a place in MACRA
MDedge Internal Medicine
VIDEO: What will be the NIMH’s focus under Dr. Joshua Gordon?
MDedge Internal Medicine
Facing a medical board investigation
MDedge Internal Medicine
CMS pilot aims to reduce physician administrative burdens
MDedge Internal Medicine