Law & Medicine

Shinal v. Toms: It’s Now Harder to Get Informed Consent


 

Dr. Tan is emeritus professor of medicine and former adjunct professor of law at the University of Hawaii, Honolulu. This article is meant to be educational and does not constitute medical, ethical, or legal advice. For additional information, readers may contact the author at siang@hawaii.edu.

References

1. Shinal v. Toms, J-106-2016, Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Decided: June 20, 2017.

2. Valles v. Albert Einstein Medical Center, 805 A.2d (PA, 2002).

3. Informed-consent ruling may have “far-reaching, negative impact.” AMA Wire, Aug 8, 2017.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Fixing the ACA: 11 practical solutions
MDedge Internal Medicine
Five outside-the-box ideas for fixing the individual insurance market
MDedge Internal Medicine
Young adults lead the ranks of recently insured
MDedge Internal Medicine
Medicare fee schedule: Proposed pay bump falls short of promise
MDedge Internal Medicine
Midyear formulary changes wreak havoc on diabetes care
MDedge Internal Medicine
Q&A: CDC director Brenda Fitzgerald stresses ‘science and service’
MDedge Internal Medicine
Trump administration ends DACA program, stranding medical students
MDedge Internal Medicine
Hurricane Harvey tests Houston physicians’ mettle
MDedge Internal Medicine
Sen. Alexander seeks quick, passable steps to stabilize individual markets
MDedge Internal Medicine
Florida health officials prepare for Hurricane Irma
MDedge Internal Medicine