Law & Medicine

Duty vs. confidentiality


 

Dr. Tan is emeritus professor of medicine and former adjunct professor of law at the University of Hawaii, Honolulu. This article is meant to be educational and does not constitute medical, ethical, or legal advice. Some of the materials have been taken from earlier columns in Internal Medicine News. For additional information, readers may contact the author at siang@hawaii.edu.

References

1. Volk v. DeMeerleer, 386 P.3d 254 (Wa. 2016).

2. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of California, 551 P.2d 334 (Cal. 1976).

3. Thompson v. County of Alameda, 167 Cal. Rptr. 70, 76 (1980).

4. Behav Sci Law. 2001;19(3):325-43.

5. AMA Code of Medical Ethics [2.24 (3), 2012-2013 ed].

6. AMA Code of Medical Ethics, 2017 ed. [3.2.1 Confidentiality].

Pages

Recommended Reading

Prescription drug monitoring programs improve, but challenges remain
MDedge Internal Medicine
What can happen if you fail to check the PDMP?
MDedge Internal Medicine
VIDEO: How a public health approach can cut opioid abuse, suicide risks
MDedge Internal Medicine
HCA is the country’s highest-volume health system
MDedge Internal Medicine
U.S. House passes 20-week abortion ban
MDedge Internal Medicine
Now missing in EHR charts: a good impression
MDedge Internal Medicine
Flat-fee primary care helps fill niche for Texas’ uninsured
MDedge Internal Medicine
MIPS: It’s time to get started
MDedge Internal Medicine
Death by meeting
MDedge Internal Medicine
Trump administration narrows contraceptive mandate
MDedge Internal Medicine