News

Physicians Often Unsure How to Disclose Medical Errors


 

WASHINGTON — Physicians generally believe that medical errors—especially those that cause an adverse event—should be disclosed to patients, but some question whether patients should be told all the details or just the basic facts about what happened, said an internist who has studied the issue.

Dr. Thomas Gallagher, associate professor of medicine at the University of Washington, Seattle, told attendees at the annual meeting of the American College of Physicians that physicians are unsure about what to include when they disclose a medical error. But he added that physicians are actively debating the best way to proceed.

“Over the next 5 years, we're going to see very exciting changes,” Dr. Gallagher said. “I think physicians as a profession will be leading the way to set some standards as to how these difficult conversations should go.”

Patients conceive of errors broadly and desire full disclosure of harmful errors, while at the same time worrying that health care workers might hide them, Dr. Gallagher said. In disclosure, they want “an explicit statement that an error occurred,” details of what happened and the implications for their health, why it happened, and how recurrences will be prevented, he said. In addition, they want an apology, he said, adding, “That really mattered very much to the patient.”

Physicians define errors more narrowly than patients do, he said. They agree in principle with full disclosure and want to be truthful, but perceive barriers to disclosure, he said. “Physicians feared that disclosure could be harmful to the patient, and physicians saw disclosure as akin to admitting personal failure,” Dr. Gallagher said, adding that most physicians haven't had any formal training in disclosure.

The University of Washington recently surveyed 4,000 physicians about communication with patients, colleagues, and health care institutions about medical errors.

According to Dr. Gallagher, the survey on error disclosure was sent to 2,000 physicians in Washington State and 2,000 Canadian physicians. The survey, which asked about general attitudes regarding disclosure, had a response rate of 63%.

Respondents were randomized to one of four specialty-specific disclosure scenarios and answered five questions to measure the content of their disclosure. Each question offered actual disclosure language that contained no information, a little information, or full disclosure.

When asked about general attitudes regarding disclosure, 98% of U.S. physicians said serious errors should be disclosed, and more than three-quarters said minor errors should be disclosed to patients. Less than one-third, however, said near misses should be disclosed, he said.

But when asked for answers in the specific scenarios, physicians didn't always want to admit that a medical error occurred. For example, one fictitious scenario involved an inpatient insulin overdose: A physician wrote an order for the patient to receive “10 U” of insulin, but the “U” in the order looked like a “0,” and the following morning the patient received 100 units of insulin. The patient later was found unresponsive, with a blood glucose level of 35 mg/dL, was resuscitated and transferred to the intensive care unit, and is expected to make a full recovery.

Nearly 65% of physicians said they would “definitely” disclose the error, and about 32% said they “probably” would disclose the error, Dr. Gallagher said. When asked how they would explain the situation, 1% said they would tell the patient, “Your blood sugar went too low and you passed out”; 28% said they would say, “Your blood sugar went too low because you received more insulin than you needed”; and 71% said they would tell the patient, “Your blood sugar went too low because an error happened and you received too much insulin.”

When asked how much detail they would provide, 11% said they would not volunteer specific details about the error unless asked by the patient; 36% said they'd tell the patient, “You received more insulin than you needed”; and 54% said they'd tell the patient, “You received 100 units rather than your usual 10 units of insulin.”

There were 3% who said they would not volunteer that they were sorry or apologize; 54% would say, “I am sorry about what happened”; and 43% would say, “I am so sorry that you were harmed by this error.”

Preliminary conclusions show that physicians support the concept of disclosure, but are uncertain about the core content of any disclosure. Most would disclose less information about errors that would not be apparent to the patient, Dr. Gallagher said, adding that medical and surgical specialties may approach disclosure differently.

There is accelerating interest in disclosure and growing experimentation with disclosure approaches among health care organizations and malpractice insurers. This goes hand-in-hand with the increased emphasis on transparency in health care, he said.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Policy & Practice
MDedge Internal Medicine
FDA System to Search For Adverse Events
MDedge Internal Medicine
Feds Offer Plan to Boost EHR Use to 40% by 2012
MDedge Internal Medicine
Google, Microsoft Launch Personal Health Record Systems
MDedge Internal Medicine
Insurer Ranking Systems Challenged in Mass.
MDedge Internal Medicine
Physician Quality Can't Be Boiled Down to a Few Measures
MDedge Internal Medicine
ACP Extends, Expands Diabetes Care Initiative
MDedge Internal Medicine
Simplify Care by Prioritizing Comorbidities
MDedge Internal Medicine
When Caring for Patients Isn't Enough
MDedge Internal Medicine
Indications
MDedge Internal Medicine