FDA/CDC

FDA advisory committee votes to recommend first once-daily aminoglycoside antibiotic


 

The Antimicrobial Drugs Advisory Committee of the Food and Drug Administration has voted to recommend plazomicin, a new aminoglycoside, for systemic use in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) but rejected it for treatment of blood stream infections (BSIs) that are caused by multidrug resistant (MDR) Enterobacteriaceae.

Advisers voted unanimously to recommend plazomicin for cUTI, but rejected the drug for BSIs in an 11-4 no vote, based on the results of two phase 3 clinical trials: EPIC and CARE.

FDA icon
The spread of antibiotic resistance is a pressing public health issue. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) and Enterobacteriaceae with extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL) bacteria are frequently resistant to many treatments from the aminoglycoside class of antibiotics. This view was echoed by Michael Green, MD, of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

“Today’s meeting brought the committee face to face with the crisis of multidrug resistant bacteria,” he said. “Results of the 009 [EPIC] study, in my mind, clearly showed plazomicin met the noninferiority endpoints.”

EPIC study

EPIC was a phase 3 clinical trial to assess the noninferiority of plazomicin to meropenem in patients with cUTI and/or acute pyelonephritis (AP). Many patients with drug resistant infections have limited treatment options, so plazomicin was reviewed under the Limited Population Antibacterial Drug pathway.

Patients in the study were stratified by geographical region and infection type – cUTI or acute pyelonephritis (AP). In total, 609 patients were randomized in the intent-to-treat (ITT) group with 306 and 303 receiving plazomicin or meropenem, respectively. Using the coprimary efficacy endpoints of microbiological eradication and clinical cure, a measure known as composite cure was developed to assess efficacy at Day 5 and the test of cure (TOC) visit in the microbiological modified intent-to-treat (mMITT) population. The mMITT group consisted of all patients who had received any dose of study drug and had at least one qualified baseline pathogen with 105 or more colony-forming units/mL that was susceptible to both meropenem and plazomicin.Plazomicin was noninferior to meropenem with a margin of 15%. At day 5, the composite cure rate was 88% in the plazomicin group, compared with 91.4% in the meropenem group. Similar results were seen at the test of cure visit, with composite cure rates of 81.7% and 70.1% in the plazomicin and meropenem groups, respectively.

Pages

Recommended Reading

MDedge Daily News: Where doctors stand on Medicaid work requirements
MDedge Internal Medicine
Common infections are potent risk factor for MI, stroke
MDedge Internal Medicine
MDedge Daily News: Shingles boosts stroke risk
MDedge Internal Medicine
MDedge Daily News: Can a nasal spray reverse suicidality?
MDedge Internal Medicine
Comorbidity occurs earlier and more commonly with HIV infection
MDedge Internal Medicine
Nitrofurantoin beats fosfomycin for uncomplicated UTI
MDedge Internal Medicine
Piperacillin-tazobactam tripled risk of death for patients with cephalosporin-resistant septicemia
MDedge Internal Medicine
HIV infection linked to higher risk of non-melanoma skin cancer
MDedge Internal Medicine
Use these two questions to simplify H. pylori treatment choice
MDedge Internal Medicine
Treatment of HCV in special populations
MDedge Internal Medicine