From the Journals

Even a year of increased water intake did not change CKD course


 

FROM JAMA


It could also be that a greater volume of water would be needed to demonstrate a protective effect for the kidneys. Despite the coaching efforts of dietitians and research assistants, the mean urine volume increase in the hydration group relative to the control group was just 0.6 liter per day, or 2.4 cups.

“This highlights how difficult it would be to achieve a large sustained increase in water intake in routine practice,” Dr. Clark and colleagues said in their report.

Dr. Clark reported disclosures related to Danone Research. Thermo Fisher Scientific provided instrumentation, assay reagent, and disposables used in the study.

SOURCE: Clark WF et al. JAMA. 2018;319(18):1870-9.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Intense urine output monitoring beneficial in ICU
MDedge Internal Medicine
Acute kidney injury linked with doubled inpatient VTEs
MDedge Internal Medicine
FDA: Gadolinium retention prompts new GBCA class warning, safety measures
MDedge Internal Medicine
FDA: Gadolinium retention prompts new GBCA class warning, safety measures
MDedge Internal Medicine
Can case management cut hypertension’s consequences?
MDedge Internal Medicine
Clearer picture emerging of renal impact of SGLT2s
MDedge Internal Medicine
Impaired kidney function no problem for dabigatran reversal
MDedge Internal Medicine
MDedge Daily News: Which nonopioids are ripe for abuse?
MDedge Internal Medicine
Avoiding in-hospital acute kidney injury is a new imperative
MDedge Internal Medicine
MDedge Daily News: How to handle opioid constipation
MDedge Internal Medicine