News

Cilostazol Matches Aspirin’s Effectiveness in Preventing Secondary Stroke

View on the News

Hope for a New Approach to Prevention

The findings of the CSPS 2 trial suggest that there might be another promising approach to secondary stroke prevention other than aspirin, but the study has several limiting factors.

Because ethnic differences in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antiplatelet agents have been observed in some studies, the results of the trial have limited generalizability. Positive results noted in one ethnic group might not be as impressive, or might even be negative, in other ethnic groups.

The trial was powered to detect noninferiority between the drugs, and although the results seemed to indicate that cilostazol is superior to aspirin, its apparent superiority must be confirmed in trials powered to make such an assessment.

CSPS 2 enrolled only patients with non-severe strokes, possibly limiting applicability of the findings to patients with more severe strokes. Other factors to consider include the high incidence of side effects in the cilostazol patients, the high cost of the drug, compared with aspirin, and the low concomitant use of other secondary prevention therapies, such as statins and antihypertensive drugs.

Dr. Dharam J. Kumbhani and Dr. Deepak L. Bhatt are with Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston. Their comments are paraphrased from an editorial (Lancet 2010 Sept. 11 [doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70217-9]). Dr. Kumbhani reported having no disclosures. Dr. Bhatt reported receiving institutional research support from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eisai, Sanofi-Aventis, and The Medicine Company, and he has received honoraria from Duke Clinical Research Institute.


 

From The Lancet

The antiplatelet drug cilostazol works at least as well as aspirin for preventing stroke in patients who have had an ischemic stroke, according to the results of a randomized trial published online in the Sept. 11 issue of The Lancet.

At a mean follow-up of 29 months in the aspirin-controlled, double-blind, noninferiority trial, first-time secondary strokes occurred at a yearly rate of 2.76% among patients who received 100 mg cilostazol twice daily and 3.71% in patients who received 81 mg aspirin once daily. This difference resulted in a hazard ratio of 0.743, or a 25.7% relative reduction of the risk of stroke with the use of cilostazol in comparison with aspirin.

The findings are important because few regimens have proven significantly more effective for stroke prevention than aspirin alone, according to Dr. Yukito Shinahara of Tachikawa Hospital, Tokyo, and colleagues from the Japanese Cilostazol for Prevention of Secondary Stroke (CSPS 2) trial group.

Since cilostazol was shown in the original CSPS trial in 2000 to be more effective than placebo for prevention of secondary cerebral infarction, it has been used in Japan for this purpose and is listed in Japanese guidelines for the management of stroke.

The 2,757 patients in the CSPS 2 trial were adults aged 20-79 years who had experienced a noncardioembolic cerebral infarction within the previous 26 weeks. They were enrolled at 278 sites in Japan between December 2003 and October 2006, and underwent treatment for 1-5 years. (Lancet 2010 Sept. 11 [doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70198-8]).

Dr. Yukito Shinahara and colleagues said that they considered cilostazol to be noninferior to aspirin for the prevention of stroke because the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval was lower than the prespecified inferiority margin of 1.33.

In addition to reducing stroke risk, cilostazol significantly reduced the risk of a composite secondary endpoint (cerebral infarction, ischemic cerebrovascular disease, or death from any cause) by 20.1%, compared with aspirin. Cilostazol also was associated with a reduced risk of hemorrhagic events, which occurred at a rate of 0.77% per person-year in cilostazol-treated patients and 1.78% per person-year in aspirin-treated patients.

Dr. Shinahara and associates noted that “because significantly fewer hemorrhagic events were recorded in the cilostazol group than in the aspirin group, cilostazol might be particularly useful in patients with increased risk of hemorrhage.”

Other adverse events, however, occurred significantly more often in cilostazol-treated patients. These included headache, diarrhea, palpitations, dizziness, and tachycardia. None of these were serious, and all resolved after treatment discontinuation or dose tapering, the investigators said.

“The results of CSPS 2 suggest that cilostazol can be recommended as an option for the prevention of stroke in Asian patients with noncardioembolic stroke who can tolerate long-term treatment with this drug,” wrote the authors, noting that previous studies have suggested that cilostazol is effective for patients of other ethnic origins as well.

In a U.S. study, patients with peripheral artery disease who took cilostazol experienced significantly fewer cerebrovascular events, compared with placebo (J. Stroke. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2008; 17:129-33).

In addition to its antiplatelet effects, cilostazol also has beneficial effects on other factors associated with thrombus formation, including endothelial function and dilation of blood vessels by increased production of nitric oxide, and reduction of intracellular calcium ion concentrations. The drug also inhibits smooth muscle proliferation and inflammation in various vascular beds, according to the researchers.

Otsuka Pharmaceutical funded the study. Dr. Shinohara disclosed providing consultancy for Schering-Plough and Pfizer Japan, and receiving grants from the Japan Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, and receiving lecture fees from Otsuka and other companies. Other authors on the study reported various financial relationships with Otsuka and other companies.

Recommended Reading

The Convergence of Art and Neuroanatomy
MDedge Internal Medicine
Estrogen Stabilization May Be Protective for Women at Risk for Brain Aneurysms
MDedge Internal Medicine
FDA Advisors Supportive of Novel Epilepsy Treatment
MDedge Internal Medicine
FDA Panel Votes to Approve Duloxetine for Lower Back Pain
MDedge Internal Medicine
Tick Paralysis is Easily Treated But Often Missed
MDedge Internal Medicine
Alzheimer's Criteria Angle for Earlier Diagnoses : Treatments to slow or halt Alzheimer's will be most effective before neuronal damage is done.
MDedge Internal Medicine
Alzheimer's Drug Pulled From Phase III for Lack of Efficacy
MDedge Internal Medicine
Among Term Births, CP Risks Are Higher at ‘Early’ and ‘Late’ Extremes
MDedge Internal Medicine
Experts Debate Impact of AAN’s New Guidelines for Acute Ischemic Stroke Diagnosis
MDedge Internal Medicine
Allergan Pleads Guilty to Off-Label Botox Promotion
MDedge Internal Medicine