News

Intensive Glucose Control Lowers Renal Event Rate in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes


 

FROM THE ANNUAL MEETING OF THE EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE STUDY OF DIABETES

STOCKHOLM – An intensive glucose control regimen aiming for a hemoglobin A1c level of 6.5% or lower significantly reduced the incidence of renal events among patients with established type 2 diabetes, according to findings from a large Australian study.

The total number of renal events in 5,571 patients randomized to intensive treatment was reduced by 11% (26.9% vs. 30%), compared with 5,569 patients who followed a standard glucose control regimen, Dr. Sophia Zoungas said at the annual meeting of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes.

The data come from the glucose-lowering arm of the multination ADVANCE (Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron-MR Controlled Evaluation) study, which examined the effects of both blood pressure lowering with perindopril/indapamide and glucose-lowering gliclazide MR in a total of 11,140 patients. Primary trial findings were reported in 2007 and 2008.

The current analysis evaluated the incidence of renal events at a median follow-up of 5 years, when the mean HbA1c level achieved was 6.5% in the intensive treatment arm and 7.3% in the standard control group, reported Dr. Zoungas, who is head of the diabetes research program at the George Institute for Global Health, Sydney.

The incidence of new microalbuminuria, defined as a urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) of 30-300 g/mg, was reduced by 9% with intensive therapy, occurring in 23.7% of patients in that group compared with 25.7% of the standard treatment group. New-onset macroalbuminuria (UACR greater than 300 g/mg) was reduced by 30% (2.9% vs. 4.1%). New or worsening nephropathy, defined as progression of albuminuria by at least one stage (from normoalbuminuria to either micro- or macroalbuminuria) was 21% lower with intensive therapy (4.1% vs. 5.2%), and end-stage renal disease was reduced by 36% (0.4% vs. 0.6%).

All of the differences were statistically significant except for those involving end-stage renal disease, which nonetheless showed a “small but important trend,” said Dr. Zoungas, also of Monash University, Clayton, Australia.

Among 3,261 patients who had albuminuria at baseline, regression by at least one stage occurred in 61.8% of the intensive treatment group, compared with 55.8% of the standard group, for a hazard ratio of 1.15. Regression to normoalbuminuria occurred in 56.8% vs. 49.7%, with a hazard ratio of 1.2. Both were highly statistically significant, she said.

Renal benefit was seen even among those patients who had HbA1c levels less than 7% at baseline. “We could not identify an HbA1c threshold below which renal benefit was lost,” Dr. Zoungas said.

The ADVANCE study was initiated and designed by investigators at the George Institute for Global Health, and received funding from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia and from Servier, the maker of Preterax and Diamicron MR. Dr. Zoungas disclosed that she has received honoraria from Servier.

Recommended Reading

FDA Panel Does Not Recommend Dosing Change for Aranesp
MDedge Internal Medicine
Hyperglycemia Trumps Metabolic Syndrome in Predicting Type 2 Diabetes
MDedge Internal Medicine
Case Series: Rituximab Benefits Refractory Graves' Orbitopathy
MDedge Internal Medicine
Hypoglycemia Common Among Diabetic Children Under 7 Years of Age
MDedge Internal Medicine
FDA Calls for New Warnings on GnRH Agonist Labels
MDedge Internal Medicine
CDC: Up to One-Third of Americans Expected to Have Diabetes by 2050
MDedge Internal Medicine
Olmesartan Delays Time to Microalbuminuria in Type 2 Diabetes Patients
MDedge Internal Medicine
FDA Rejects Application for Obesity Drug Lorcaserin
MDedge Internal Medicine
Doctors Don't Agree on How to Reform Medicare Payment
MDedge Internal Medicine
High Tibial Osteotomy Use Dwindles as Total Knee Arthroplasties Rise
MDedge Internal Medicine