From the Journals

Patients differ with providers on definitions for IBD remission


 

FROM INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES

Patients’ reports of remission from inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) don’t always line up with remission as defined by patient-reported outcomes (PROs) or physician global assessment (PGA), according to a study published in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.

A doctor talking to her patient. javi_indy/ Thinkstock

Patients have various definitions of remission, which may focus on symptom improvement and the impact on daily activities, while physicians tend to focus on test results. “Examining patient-reported remission may be a valuable approach to better understand remission from the perspective of patients and can assist in aligning shared decision-making between patients and health care providers,” wrote Kendra Kamp, PhD, assistant professor of biobehavioral nursing and health informatics at the University of Washington, and colleagues, on behalf of the IBD Qorus.

In a retrospective study, Dr. Kamp and colleagues analyzed 3,257 deidentified surveys from 2,004 patients who participated in the Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation’s IBD Qorus Learning Health System between September 2019 and February 2021. Adults with IBD who participated in the IBD Qorus received an email before their gastroenterology clinical appointment with a link to a survey that asked questions about primary concerns or goals, symptoms, well-being, recent health care utilization, and medication use.

Kendra Kamp, PhD, assistant professor of biobehavioral nursing and health informatics at the University of Washington

Dr. Kendra Kamp

The researchers looked at the clinical and demographic factors associated with discordance among patient-defined remission, PROs, and PGAs. Patient-defined remission was captured as a yes/no response to the question: “Do you feel your disease is currently in remission (by remission we mean a complete absence of IBD-related symptoms)?”

PROs for ulcerative colitis were measured through stool frequency and rectal bleeding, with remission defined as no blood in the stool and a normal (or fewer than normal) number of stools. For Crohn’s disease, PROs were measured through the average number of liquid stools, abdominal pain, and general well-being, with remission defined as two or fewer loose stools, no or mild abdominal pain, and feeling generally well or slightly under par.

For PGAs, clinicians selected whether the patient had normal, mild, moderate, or severe disease activity. The values were included in the analysis if the clinicians completed the assessment within 14 days of the patient’s survey.

Among the 2,004 patients, 806 had ulcerative colitis and 1,198 had Crohn’s disease. Patients with ulcerative colitis as well as those with Crohn’s disease were aged 44 years on average. Most of the patients were women: 58% with ulcerative colitis and 56% with Crohn’s disease.

Among the 1,316 visits for ulcerative colitis, 668 patients (51%) self-reported to be in remission, compared with 55% in remission based on PROs. Of the people in PRO–defined remission, 77% reported being in remission, and 23% reported active disease. Of the people with PRO–defined active disease, 81% reported active disease and 19% reported remission. Overall concordance was 79% between patient self-reported and PRO–defined remission.

Discordance in patient-defined remission for ulcerative colitis was primarily influenced by tolerance of an increased stool frequency. About 25% of patients with one or two stools more than normal reported being in remission.

A subset of 397 ulcerative colitis visits had an associated PGA score. Among patients in PGA-defined remission, 53% reported being in remission. Of those with PGA-defined active disease, 60% reported active disease. Overall, concordance was 49% between patient self-reported and PGA-defined remission.

Among the 1,947 visits for Crohn’s disease, 929 patients (48%) self-reported to be in remission, compared with 63% in remission based on PRO. Of the people in PRO-defined remission, 63% reported being in remission, although 37% reported active disease. Of the people with PRO-defined active disease, 79% reported active disease and 21% reported remission. Overall concordance was 69% between patient self-reported and patient-reported outcomes–defined remission.

Discordance in patient-defined remission for Crohn’s disease was primarily influenced by patients with a tolerance of mild to moderate symptoms.

A subset of 575 Crohn’s disease visits had an associated PGA score. Among patients in PGA-defined remission, 52% reported being in remission. Of those with PGA-defined active disease, 57% reported active disease. Overall concordance was 54% between patient self-reported and PGA-defined remission.

Several factors were associated with discordance in remission definitions. Among patients in PRO-defined remission, those who had a diagnosis of IBD for fewer than 5 years were more likely to report having active disease compared with those who had received a diagnosis more than 15 years before.

Patients with high health confidence in managing their condition were less likely to report having active disease. In addition, patients with Crohn’s disease were more likely to report having active disease if they were using prednisone or opioids or if they had an IBD-related emergency department visit in the past 6 months.

Dr. Sadeea Abbasi

“Studies that address the discordance between patient-reported outcomes and clinician assessment in inflammatory bowel disease are important to develop a patient-centered model of practice,” said Sadeea Abbasi, MD, PhD, a gastroenterologist and IBD specialist at Cedars-Sinai Gastroenterology in Santa Monica, Calif.

Dr. Abbasi, who wasn’t involved with this study, has promoted patient advocacy in IBD management.

“Measurable objective data are not the only parameter to measure disease outcomes or individualize treatment protocols. In fact, outcomes can dramatically change if the patient’s experience is not taken into account. Studies that address this reality are crucial for physicians to be able to advocate for their patients,” she said. “The empowered physician-patient relationship is one of strength and trust and tends to be associated with the best overall outcomes.”

IBD Qorus is an initiative of the Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation and is supported by numerous pharmaceutical companies. Supporters had no involvement in the study and didn’t provide direct funding for any aspect of the study. The authors have received funding from the Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation, National Institutes of Health, and various foundations and pharmaceutical companies. Dr. Abbasi reported no relevant disclosures.

Recommended Reading

UC reaches remission with FMT plus anti-inflammatory diet: Study
MDedge Internal Medicine
AI tool may improve prediction of colorectal cancer recurrence
MDedge Internal Medicine
Will AI affect the burden of patient surveillance after polyp removal?
MDedge Internal Medicine
Colonoscopy in FIT-based screening demands higher ADR
MDedge Internal Medicine
Antioxidant-rich diet may reduce Helicobacter pylori risk
MDedge Internal Medicine
Colonoscopy lowers CRC risk and death, but not by much: NordICC
MDedge Internal Medicine
Water exchange boosts colonoscopy training experience
MDedge Internal Medicine
Sigmoidoscopy screening cuts CRC mortality, incidence
MDedge Internal Medicine
Real-world evidence seen for metal stents in biliary strictures
MDedge Internal Medicine
Mentorship key to improving GI, hepatology workforce diversity
MDedge Internal Medicine