Latest News

Contact allergens lurk in diabetes devices


 

FROM ACDS 2023

Patch testing

When diabetes devices are suspected as the source of allergic contact dermatitis, a minimum of a baseline series that contains colophony at a concentration of 20% in petrolatum should be carried out, Dr. Chen said. Commercialized patch test trays, which include plastics, glues, acrylates, epoxy resins/isocyanates, and colophony derivatives, should be ideal. “Personal-care products should be included if they are potentially relevant,” she added.

Dr. Chen shared tables published in Contact Dermatitis in 2021 with examples of screening test series. She said to consider including screening for other allergens more recently discovered in diabetes devices, including 2,2’-methylenebis(6-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol) monoacrylate (MBPA) 1.5% pet; dipropylene glycol diacrylate (DPGDA) 0.1% pet; and butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) 2% pet.

Testing for monomethyl ether of hydroquinone should also be considered; this may be included in the test preparations for IBOA and DMAA.

Management strategies

For patients who experience skin reactions to their diabetes devices, consideration may given to relocating the device to another area of skin or changing sensors more frequently, according to Dr. Chen.

For some patients, the reaction can be managed with corticosteroid cream, ointment, solution, or nasal spray. Topical antibiotics or topical antihistamines can be helpful, as can barrier dressings, solutions, or sprays, she said. The best solution is to change to a device that does not have the culprit allergen, “but that is difficult, since we don’t know what is in these devices,” she added. Good alternatives include the Eversense CGM device or devices that have been demonstrated not to contain IBOA, such as the Freestyle Libre 2 or the newer version of the Omnipod, an insulin delivery system

Looking ahead, Dr. Chen said that “mandatory labeling is needed, as devices with the same name may have different compositions, depending on the date of manufacture.” Allergens relevant to people with diabetes are constantly evolving, and many are still unidentified, so clinicians and manufacturers need to work together to identify the culprit allergens and their sources, she said.

Dr. Chen has served as principal investigator or subinvestigator for Amgen, AbbVie, and Sanofi Regeneron and as a consultant for Purity Brands.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Training program linked to less hand eczema for hairdressers
MDedge Internal Medicine
Hairdressers have ‘excess risk’ of contact allergies
MDedge Internal Medicine
Breaking the itch-scratch cycle with mindfulness
MDedge Internal Medicine
Higher metal contact allergy rates found in metalworkers
MDedge Internal Medicine
Isothiazolinone contact allergy up in North America, down in Europe
MDedge Internal Medicine
Silicone-based film for radiation dermatitis: It works, so why isn’t it used?
MDedge Internal Medicine
Are you misdiagnosing IBS? Watch out for this mimic
MDedge Internal Medicine
Lanolin gets nod for Allergen of the Year
MDedge Internal Medicine
Pilot study evaluates sensitive skin burden in persons of color
MDedge Internal Medicine
Beware the hidden allergens in nutritional supplements
MDedge Internal Medicine