Conference Coverage

Youth-led sexual health program improves teen knowledge, autonomy


 

AT ACOG 2023

A youth-led discussion and education program, facilitated by experts during monthly meetings, significantly increased teen participants’ knowledge and self-efficacy around sexual and reproductive health, according to research presented at the annual clinical and scientific meeting of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

While the small pilot study focused primarily on assessing feasibility and effectiveness, the results suggest potential for scaling the program up to reach a larger audience and assessing the knowledge disseminated from direct youth participants.

Saumya Sao, clinical researcher in gynecology and obstetrics at the Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore Ms. Sao

Saumya Sao

“The good thing about this subject is that not a lot of it has to be context-specific,” Saumya Sao, a clinical researcher in gynecology and obstetrics at the Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, and the study’s lead author, said in an interview. “A lot of it is just baseline information that everybody needs and doesn’t get.”

Jaime Friedman, MD, a pediatrician and director of marketing at Children’s Primary Care Medical Group in San Diego, was not involved in the study but was impressed with the program’s objectives and results so far.

Dr. Jaime Friedman, Children’s Primary Care Medical Group in San Diego Dr. Friedman

Dr. Jaime Friedman

“While education is massively important, teens don’t always want to hear it from their parents or other adults,” Dr. Friedman said in an interview. “Learning from their peers is one way to overcome this hurdle.”

Given the high rate of sexually transmitted infections and unintended pregnancies in youth, paired with low sexual and reproductive health literacy in this population, the researchers sought to learn whether a program focused on peer-to-peer health education on these topics was feasible. The goal was to increase youth sexual and reproductive health knowledge, self-efficacy, and autonomy using a youth-led intervention.

The researchers hosted nine monthly, interactive, youth-led sessions that lasted 2 hours over Zoom or in person. Incorporated into the meetings were principles from Youth Participatory Action Research (YPAR) and Positive Youth Development (PYD).

The major topics included the following: Use of social media, values and goal-setting, anatomy and menstrual health, risk factors of sexual activities , STI and HIV prevention, contraceptive methods, healthy relationships and consent, practice responding to unhealthy behavior, gender and sexuality, and social media and body image.

The 24 participants were provided with transportation to the study site at the researchers’ institution and received financial compensation for their participation. They were an average 15.8 years old, lived in the greater Baltimore area, and mostly self-identified as female. Eight percent identified as non-binary and half (50%) identified as LGBTQIA+. Just over half the participants (52%) were Black/African American, 28% were Asian/Asian American, 12% were White, and 8% were Hispanic. The participants attended an average 88% of the sessions throughout the full intervention.

For each of the nine sessions, more than 50% of participants reported that they “learned a lot,” and only one participant reported for one session (session 5) that they “didn’t learn” anything. The researchers assessed participants’ knowledge, self-efficacy, and sense of autonomy at baseline and after completion of the intervention. Significant improvements occurred across all areas.

The average score improved by 31% in sexual and reproductive health knowledge (P < .001), 33% in sexual and reproductive health services awareness (P = .002), 46% in advocacy and empowerment (P < .001), 16% in general perceived efficacy (P = .002), and 22% personal sexuality empowerment (P = .006).

Ms. Sao said she was very pleased to see that the improvements were significant in every domain they measured, which she attributed largely to the incorporation of YPAR and PYD into the program.

“We approached it using these two frameworks that really do focus on involving youth in the teaching themselves, so I think that’s what increased their general perceived efficacy and advocacy empowerment without us necessarily having to emphasize, ‘You are advocates,’” Ms. Sao said. “Those frameworks ask the youth for their opinions and then give the youth an opportunity in every single session to be teachers themselves, and I think that lends itself well to all of the domains.”

Ms. Sao was also pleasantly surprised at the high level of retention across the 9 months.

“Every single session was slotted for 2 hours, but they would want to stay for 3 hours. Eventually, we actually started meeting with them twice a month, just adding an extra session,” she said. “As they gained confidence, they were so excited to be peer educators and realized, ‘I can really do this. I can teach my peers. We’re not getting this from anywhere else.’ ”

Ms. Sao and another study author, Maclaine Barré-Quick, an undergraduate research assistant at Johns Hopkins University, said the participants quickly discovered how easy it was to have a non-stigmatizing conversation about many of the topics once a subject was brought up.

“They’re actively looking for that opportunity,” Ms. Barré-Quick said in an interview.

Dr. Friedman agreed that this type of program provides what many adolescents need in a way that they may welcome more than through other methods.

“Adolescents’ bodies are approaching adulthood and function like adults, but their brains are still developing. They don’t have the worldly experience and education of adults, but they think they know everything,” Dr. Friedman said. “They are a population known for their high risk behavior due to their natural impulsivity. This can be a scary combination, especially when it comes to sexual health.”

But if teens don’t want to hear some of the information they need from adults, they may be more open to hearing it from other teens, Dr. Friedman said.

“Using an evidence-based approach ensures the desired outcome of healthier habits, decreased STIs and decreased teen pregnancy,” Dr. Friedman said. “It also adds weight to the argument against abstinence-only education. Teens deserve accurate and evidence-based education about their own bodies.”

Ms. Sao said the next steps will be exploring ways to scale the program up, such as putting the curriculum resources into a bundle available to other educators. They’re also looking at ways to put it into an online platform that’s self-paced, though that requires solving the challenge of having synchronous meetings for youth-led discussion.

“There are certain kinks that we have to work out because there were some activities where I think the students really benefited from having those open discussions with each other, so [we need to determine] how to replicate that in an online format,” Ms. Sao said.

Dr. Friedman agreed that scalability appears to be the biggest challenge, along with funding programs. But if those obstacles can be overcome, such programs would complement and expand on the education she does currently with families.

“I don’t have time for a full sex ed course at each visit,” Dr. Friedman said. “I would like to be able to direct them to a program that I know works and would be easy for them to complete. Even better, this would be an amazing program to ‘sell’ to practices interested in hosting these sessions themselves.”

Ms. Sao said they also hope to assess the impact of the intervention on the participants’ peers to see how well the knowledge and self-efficacy spread through the youths’ teaching.

No external funding was noted. One author reported research support from Hologic and Merck. Dr. Friedman had no disclosures.

Recommended Reading

Pandemic may be limiting ED access for sexual assault
MDedge Internal Medicine
Bacterial vaginosis linked with persistent HPV infections
MDedge Internal Medicine
Can a hormone shot rescue low libido?
MDedge Internal Medicine
Spotting STIs: Vaginal swabs work best
MDedge Internal Medicine
More states nix nonconsensual pelvic exams by med students
MDedge Internal Medicine
Neuropsychiatric side effects of hormonal contraceptives: More common than you think!
MDedge Internal Medicine
Best practices document outlines genitourinary applications of lasers and energy-based devices
MDedge Internal Medicine
Federal rules don’t require period product ingredients on packaging labels. States are stepping in.
MDedge Internal Medicine
Breast cancer survivors need a comprehensive care plan, says doctor
MDedge Internal Medicine
Unveiling sexual dysfunction: Clinicians can do more
MDedge Internal Medicine