News

FDA Panel Votes on Peginesatide for Some Anemia


 

FROM A MEETING OF THE FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION'S ONCOLOGIC DRUGS ADVISORY COMMITTEE

SILVER SPRING, MD. – The majority of a Food and Drug Administration advisory panel on Dec. 7 voted that peginesatide, a new erythropoiesis-stimulating agent, has a favorable risk-benefit profile when used to treat anemia associated with chronic renal failure in patients who are on dialysis.

At a meeting of the FDA’s Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee, it voted 15-1 with one abstention on the risk-benefit question. One of the two cardiologists on the panel voted no; the other abstained. The panel did not vote specifically on whether to recommend approval.

Affymax Inc., the manufacturer of peginesatide – a long-acting erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) administered intravenously or subcutaneously – has proposed that it be approved for the treatment of anemia associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) in adults who are on dialysis, but not in CKD patients who are not on dialysis or in cancer patients. Peginesatide is administered once a month, which is less frequently than the two ESAs approved in the United States: epoetin alfa, marketed as Epogen and Procrit, and darbepoetin alfa, marketed as Aranesp. A pegylated epoetin beta (Mircera) is not available in the United States.

In two phase III studies of patients with anemia due to CKD who were on dialysis, 1,066 subjects were treated with peginesatide once a month and 542 were treated with epoetin administered one to three times a week. The effectiveness of peginesatide in maintaining hemoglobin levels at 10-12 g/dL through weeks 29-36 of treatment was similar to that of epoetin, with similar low transfusion rates in both groups. The safety profiles, including serious adverse events, deaths during the study, and adverse events resulting in permanent discontinuation of treatment, were similar in both treatment groups.

But in two phase III studies of patients with anemia due to CKD who were not on dialysis, peginesatide appeared to be less safe than darbepoetin. In these two studies, the rates of adverse events, serious adverse events, deaths during the study, adverse events leading to discontinuation as well as adverse cardiovascular outcomes were higher among those on peginesatide than among those on darbepoetin.

Panelists expressed concerned about this safety signal in the patients not on dialysis, but those who voted in favor of peginesatide for the proposed indication agreed that the safety and efficacy of peginesatide were comparable with epoetin in two large randomized studies and cited the convenience of once-a-month dosing for patients. They recommended postmarketing follow-up of these patients to provide longer-term data, since the average length of ESA treatment in patients with CKD is about 5 years and patients in the studies were followed for a little more than 1 year.

The two cardiologists on the panel cited concerns about the studies not being blinded and the possibility that the differences in toxicity in the two patient groups might not be explained pathophysiologically but instead might be the result of stricter entry criteria in the study of patients on dialysis. They also cited the potential for misuse of these drugs in patients.

Targeting higher hemoglobin levels with ESA treatment has been associated with an increased risk of MI and other adverse cardiovascular outcomes in several large clinical trials, which led to changes in treatment recommendations.

In 2007, a boxed warning about the increased risk of deaths and serious cardiovascular events when higher hemoglobin levels are targeted was added to the labels of ESAs, with the recommendation to individualize dosing to target and maintain hemoglobin levels within the 10-12 g/dL range. In 2009, a warning about the increased risk of stroke based on the results of a study of patients with diabetes and CKD who were not on dialysis was added to ESA labels.

The FDA usually follows the recommendations of its advisory panels, which are not binding. Panelists have been cleared of potential conflicts of interest related to the topic of the meeting. Occasionally, a panelist may be given a waiver, but not at this meeting.

Recommended Reading

FDA Approves Tadalafil for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
MDedge Internal Medicine
U.S. Task Force: No PSA Testing for Healthy Men
MDedge Internal Medicine
Vitamin D Levels Lower in Pelvic Floor Disorders
MDedge Internal Medicine
One-Quarter of MS Patients Report Using Catheters
MDedge Internal Medicine
UPDATED: Vytorin Gets FDA Panel Nod for Some CKD Patients
MDedge Internal Medicine
Supplements May Exacerbate Chronic Kidney Disease
MDedge Internal Medicine
Intensive Glycemic Control Protects Kidneys in Type 1 Diabetes
MDedge Internal Medicine
Too Much, Too Little Glucose Risky in Diabetics on Dialysis
MDedge Internal Medicine
Urinary Sodium Excretion Levels Flag CV Risk
MDedge Internal Medicine
Panel Endorses Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer
MDedge Internal Medicine