News

Vismodegib Continues to Prove BCC Effectiveness

View on the News

A Landmark Day for Patients

The two studies show that vismodegib is highly effective. "It is a landmark day for patients with basal cell carcinoma and all those involved in their care – the greatest advance in therapy yet seen for this disease," Dr. John T. Lear wrote in an accompanying editorial.

The response rates were impressive, especially in patients with basal cell nevus syndrome.

"However, the side effects are considerable and frequent, resulting in high rates of drug discontinuation, and these rates will probably be even higher in clinical practice," he said.

Another question raised is whether hedgehog pathway inhibition truly clears the BCC or whether it leaves residual resistant cells that could give rise to a recurrence. Follow-up studies are needed to address this question, Dr. Lear said (N. Engl. J. Med. 2012;366:2225-6).

Intermittent dosing might allow more patients to benefit by preventing new lesions. This would be especially important for BCC nevus syndrome. And for patients with large, symptomatic lesions, "the usefulness of local control in improving quality of life should not be underestimated," he noted.

Dr. Lear is affiliated with the Manchester Academic Health Science Centre at Manchester (England) University and the departments of dermatology at Salford Royal Hospital and Central Manchester National Health Service Foundation Trusts. He has received consulting fees from Novartis for an ongoing BCC study.


 

FROM THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE

Study 2: Basal Cell Nevus Syndrome

In a second randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 41 patients with basal cell nevus syndrome, Dr. Jean Y. Tang and colleagues found that vismodegib reduced BCC tumors and blocked the development of new BCCs.

Basal cell nevus syndrome is rare, but it causes hundreds or thousands of carcinomas in each patient. There is no therapy, and often patients have to undergo multiple surgeries to remove the tumors.

Patients with the condition have one defective copy of the tumor suppressor gene (PTCH1), which inhibits the hedgehog signaling pathway, noted Dr. Tang of Stanford University (Calif.), and her colleagues.

The study enrolled patients from Sept. 2009 through Jan. 2011, but in Dec. 2010 the data safety and monitoring board decided to end the placebo treatment because the results so highly favored vismodegib. Patients were randomized to placebo or 150 mg daily of the drug for a planned 18 months.

The primary end point was the comparative rate of appearance of new BCCs that were eligible for surgery. Patients were followed for a mean of 8 months. Those who took vismodegib had a much lower rate of surgically eligible disease: 2 vs. 29 cases for placebo. Existing carcinomas shrunk by 65% in vismodegib-treated patients, compared with only 11% for placebo patients. Vismodegib patients also had fewer surgeries than patients receiving placebo: 0.31 per patient compared with 4.4 per patient, respectively.

At 1 month, there was a 90% reduction in hedgehog target-gene expression. There was no residual carcinoma in 83% of the biopsy samples taken from sites where the disease had been judged to be clinically regressed (N. Engl. J. Med. 2012;366:2180-8).

Fifty-four percent of study patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events. Patients treated with vismodegib were more likely to have grade 1 or 2 dysgeusia, muscle cramps, hair loss, and weight loss. They also had more grade 3 or 4 adverse events. The authors said that these side effects were similar to those reported in phase 1 and 2 trials of vismodegib, and also in other studies of therapies that inhibit the hedgehog pathway.

The authors concluded that vismodegib reduces tumor burden and blocks new tumor growth, but whether some of the clinically regressed tumors still harbor residual tumor cells cannot be ruled out – which could explain why there is tumor regrowth after therapy is stopped.

However, the "findings confirm the essential role of the hedgehog pathway in basal cell carcinomas," they wrote.

The trial was funded by Genentech and by grants from the National Institutes of Health, the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, the National Cancer Institute, the Swim Across America Foundation, and the Michael J. Rainen Family Foundation. Dr. Tang reported receiving consulting fees from Genentech. Several coauthors of the study reported receiving grants or fees from Genentech.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Women 30% More Likely to Survive Melanoma Than Men
MDedge Internal Medicine
Dark-Skinned Patients Not Getting Skin Cancer Message
MDedge Internal Medicine
USPSTF: Counsel Kids, Young Adults on Sun Exposure
MDedge Internal Medicine
CDC: Indoor Tanning, Sunburns Still Common in Young Adults
MDedge Internal Medicine
FDA Delays Sunscreen Rule by 6 Months
MDedge Internal Medicine
Environmental Working Group Releases Sunscreen Ranking
MDedge Internal Medicine
SCREEN: Melanoma Deaths Reduced by Half in Largest Study Ever
MDedge Internal Medicine
Update on the Earth’s Natural Sunscreen
MDedge Internal Medicine
Vismodegib Proves Promising for Operable BCCs
MDedge Internal Medicine
Stanford Experience Shows Long Metastatic BCC Survival
MDedge Internal Medicine

Related Articles