As for how the Solitaire and Trevo devices compare with each other, no conclusions can be drawn from SWIFT and TREVO 2 because the two studies used different definitions of reperfusion and good neurological outcomes. However, the devices, both of which have been cleared for general use in the United States and Europe, appear to have a similar or better safety profile than the Merci retriever, and the results thus far suggest that "significant improvement could be forthcoming in stroke patients for whom drug treatment is ineffective," according to a Lancet press statement.
The SWIFT trial was funded by Covidien/ev3, the maker of the Solitaire device. TREVO 2 was funded by Stryker Neurological, the maker of Trevo. Many of the investigators disclosed conflicts of interest involving Covidien/ev3 Neurovascular or Stryker Neurological, as well as other manufacturers of endovascular therapies for stroke.