News

Patient global score predicts postbiological quality of life gain in RA

View on the News

Self-report measures document value

An important – and perhaps critical – task for the rheumatology community is to document effective treatment, even though only a small proportion of patients achieve clinical remission, according to Dr. Theodore Pincus and his colleagues.

"This goal might be met more effectively by analyzing efforts to control the most significant individual core data set measures to achieve improved quality of life and reversal of premature mortality – patient global estimate and physical function on a patient questionnaire – rather than by focusing on indices or remission," they wrote in an editorial (J. Rheumatol. 2013;40:1469-74).


Dr. Theodore Pincus

The findings by Dr. Linde and her colleagues document the value of a patient global estimate of status to explain improvement in quality of life associated with treatment, and suggest that control of patient global estimate could be more valuable than factors such as joint counts, radiographic scores, or laboratory tests for justifying expensive RA treatments.

The findings underscore the importance of assessing patient global estimate and physical function – another important factor for predicting outcomes. These can be assessed easily on the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) or the multidimensional HAQ, they noted.

"However, quantitative clinical data from a patient history in the form of a patient self-report questionnaire, and even from physical examination in the form of joint counts and physician global estimate, have not been incorporated by most clinical rheumatologists, at least in the United States," they wrote.

Completing these questionnaires creates no extra work or patient flow interference, as they could be done by patients in the waiting area, and could provide documentation of the value of expensive treatments.

"Routine collection of these quantitative data ... rather than simple notation of gestalt impressions by the physician, would appear to be an intellectual and ethical responsibility to our patients with RA," they concluded.

Dr. Pincus is with New York University and NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York. No disclosures were reported.


 

FROM THE JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY

Danish researchers report that rheumatoid arthritis patients’ baseline patient global score component of the Disease-Activity Score–28 tool was most strongly correlated with patient-reported outcomes and was the best predictor of a gain in quality adjusted life years following 1 year of biological therapy in a prospective observational study.

An objective C-reactive protein (CRP) measure, however, had no predictive value, and no sharp demarcation between objective and subjective variables was apparent.

The finding that patient global score at baseline may drive a gain in quality adjusted life years (QALY) could improve understanding of which disease-related factors might affect the cost per QALY gains (an important measure for comparing the cost-effectiveness of treatments) and predict treatment response, according to Dr. Louise Linde of the DANBIO Registry, Glostrup, Denmark, and her colleagues (J. Rheumatol. 2013;40:1479-86).

Of 282 patients who completed the study, 68% gained QALYs following 1 year of biological therapy (mean of 0.14), 61% were European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) criteria responders, and 62% achieved minimally important differences based on the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire.

The proportion of patients achieving both a EULAR and EQ-5D response was 55%. Cross-tabulation by response groups (EULAR response/EQ-5D response, EULAR no response/EQ-5D no response, EULAR response/EQ-5D no response, and EULAR no response/EQ-5D response) showed that the mean reduction in swollen joints across the groups ranged from 0 to 6 with clinically and statistically significant differences in three of six possible comparisons.

Similar patterns were seen for tender joints and patient global score, the investigators said.

"Thus, the mean reduction in tender joints ranged from –1 to 9 across the response groups. In addition, the EULAR no response/EQ-5D response group could be discriminated from the EULAR response/EQ-5D response group, leading to significant differences (3-9 tender joints) in four of six comparisons. Similarly, the mean reduction in patient global score ranged from –0.7 to 4.0 cm across the response groups, and highly significant differences of 2.0-4.7 cm were observed between the response groups in five of six comparisons," they said.

However, the mean reduction in CRP, which ranged from 6.0 to 16.5 mg/L across the response groups, distinguished only the EULAR response/EQ-5D response from the EULAR nonresponders.

All EULAR responders experienced significant reductions in swollen and tender joints, CRP, and patient global scores – regardless of EQ-5D status – and the EULAR nonresponders who had an EQ-5D response experienced similar improvements. However, those with no EQ-5D response experienced a worsening in patient global score of 0.7.

Patient global score was strongly correlated with responses on both the EULAR and European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions EQ-5D.

Regression analysis demonstrated that "the gain in QALY after 1 year of biological therapy increased with increasing baseline patient global score and number of swollen joints, and patients with two or more extraarticular manifestations gained more QALY compared with those without such manifestations," the investigators wrote.

"This finding may reflect the likely scenario that patients with very active or severe disease have more room for improvement. This does not imply, however that such patients will have a more favorable final status than those with less active or less severe disease at baseline, a conclusion not supported by our observational data," they noted.

The mean age of the patients in this study was 55 years. They were recruited from 17 routine care sites between November 2005 and July 2007. Clinical and patient-reported data were collected at baseline and after 3, 6, and 12 months of therapy. Clinical data were obtained via the Danish DANBIO registry, which includes 90% of Danish patients with RA who are receiving biological therapy. Collected clinical data included disease duration, 28 swollen and tender joint counts, CRP, patient global score on a visual analog scale, IgM-rheumatoid factor status, number of previous biological therapies, and concomitant use of methotrexate and glucocorticoids. Self-reported patient data included marital status, education, smoking behavior, body mass index, exercise habits, extra-articular features, joint surgery, and comorbidities.

In addition to the EQ-5D, participants also completed the validated Danish Health Assessment Questionnaire.

Though limited by the factors inherent in observational study design, the study is strengthened by the nationwide recruitment, the fact that is was carried out in a clinical setting, and the fact that the study population had similar baseline demographic, clinical, and patent-reported values as have been reported for other RA patients treated with biological therapies in routine care in several other registries.

"This result suggests that our findings may be generalizable to patients with RA treated in routine care with biologicals in countries with a public healthcare system similar to the Danish model," the investigators wrote.

Recommended Reading

Meta-analysis: Lateral wedges don’t reduce medial knee OA pain
MDedge Internal Medicine
Switching nonadherent to denosumab improved bone density
MDedge Internal Medicine
Anserine bursitis: Often-overlooked cause of knee pain
MDedge Internal Medicine
Suboptimal, dissatisfying treatment affects many psoriasis patients
MDedge Internal Medicine
Omega-3 fatty acid found in fish may reduce RA risk
MDedge Internal Medicine
Current diagnostic criteria for early rheumatoid arthritis must be used judiciously
MDedge Internal Medicine
Perceived stigma linked to depression in female SLE patients
MDedge Internal Medicine
Depression in pediatric SLE matches average rates
MDedge Internal Medicine
Sleep problems common, untreated in systemic lupus erythematosus
MDedge Internal Medicine
Biosimilar matches up well against infliximab in RA trial
MDedge Internal Medicine