News

Vitamin E may slow functional decline in Alzheimer’s

View on the News

Vitamin E: More questions than answers

This study contains both potentially good and bad news for Alzheimer’s disease therapy, Dr. Denis Evans and his coauthors wrote in an accompanying editorial (JAMA 2014;311:29-30).

"For memantine therapy in this context, the trial results are not encouraging," wrote Dr. Evans. "Use in individuals with milder AD may be widespread, despite little evidence suggesting the agent is beneficial at this level of disease severity. This trial ... does not provide any new data to support its use."

For vitamin E, however, the results are more intriguing, especially in light of findings from prior studies.

"A previous trial among individuals with moderate to severe AD found delayed disease progression with 2,000 IU/day of [vitamin E] both alone and in combination with selegiline (N. Engl. J. Med. 1997;336:1216-22). The results of a trial of vitamin E therapy among people with mild cognitive impairment were null, however, as were the results of trials examining the effects of vitamin E on cognitive function among people with normal cognition."

The study begs three questions, Dr. Evans noted. First, is the use of functional ability a more sensitive measure of AD progression than cognition, which showed no improvement?

Second, why did the secondary measures of caregiver time and dependence not confirm the primary finding of a slower functional decline?

Third, how would vitamin E work to delay decline in Alzheimer’s? "Much attention is focused on its antioxidant properties, but this mechanism is not specific for AD," Dr. Evans wrote.

"Although these considerations do not lessen the significance of the difference found between the group randomized to vitamin E and the group randomized to placebo for the primary outcome, this difference would have been more convincing if also supported by parallel improvements in the relevant secondary outcomes and by a vitamin E mechanism of action more specific to AD."

Dr. Evans is the Alla V. and Solomon Jesmer Professor of Medicine at Rush Medical Center, Chicago. He had no commercial financial disclosures. A coauthor, Dr. Martha Clare Morris, reported receiving consultant fees from Nutrispective.


 

"I expect some will suggest that the difference in disease stage may matter, but there seems to be a growing and now large consensus that earlier intervention is better, so why would we expect later intervention with an agent of proven nonbenefit earlier to be effective later? I am actually puzzled that anyone is even still studying this."

The study by Dr. Dysken and his colleagues was funded by the Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program. The authors noted multiple financial disclosures, including many with pharmaceutical companies.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Don’t ignore headaches in teens with bipolar disorder
MDedge Internal Medicine
Small study: TBI leads to rapid deposition of brain amyloid
MDedge Internal Medicine
Nerve growth factor gene therapy delivered safely in Alzheimer’s patients
MDedge Internal Medicine
Memantine helped to delay driving impairment in early Alzheimer’s
MDedge Internal Medicine
Good news: ‘fibrofog’ doesn’t portend Alzheimer’s
MDedge Internal Medicine
Cholinesterase inhibitors most effective in mild Alzheimer’s
MDedge Internal Medicine
Subjective memory complaints predict clinical impairment
MDedge Internal Medicine
Mild cognitive impairment symptom mimics common before Alzheimer’s diagnosis
MDedge Internal Medicine
Daily multivitamin didn’t preserve cognitive function in men
MDedge Internal Medicine
Study finds no link between thyroid function and MCI
MDedge Internal Medicine