News

Warfarin beneficial after acute atrial fib–associated MI in chronic kidney disease

View on the News

Findings may not apply elsewhere

The findings by Carrero and colleagues may not apply to patients with CKD who develop acute MI with atrial fibrillation if they don’t have the distinct advantage of residing in Sweden, a country in which the health care system provides better quality of INR control than any other – with a TTR (time in therapeutic range) of 77%, said Dr. Wolfgang C. Winkelmayer and Dr. Mintu P. Turakhia.

In contrast, the mean TTR in the United States was only 66%, and this country ranked 16th out of 44 countries participating in a large international study. Another study showed that mean TTR in U.S. health care systems with anticoagulation clinic networks was only 48% in the first 6 months of warfarin use and 61% thereafter, they noted.

"Unless the excellent quality of INR control achieved by the Swedish Health Care system can be replicated, the benefit of warfarin is likely to be markedly attenuated and possibly could cause harm. Future work that defines the TTR threshold of net clinical benefit in CKD will be critical to inform practice," they said.

Dr. Winkelmayer is in the division of nephrology and the department of health research and policy at Stanford University, Palo Alto, Calif. He is an associate editor at JAMA. Dr. Turakhia is in the division of cardiovascular medicine at Stanford and the Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System. Dr. Winkelmayer reported serving as an adviser or consultant to Acumen, Amgen, GlaxoSmithKline, Keryx, Medgenics, Medtronic, and Mitsubishi Tanabe; Dr. Turakhia reported ties to Gilead Sciences, iRhythm, Medtronic, Precision Health Economics, and St. Jude Medical. These remarks were taken from their editorial accompanying Dr. Carrero’s report (JAMA 2014;311:913-4).


 

FROM JAMA

Warfarin therapy decreased the composite endpoint of death, recurrent myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke after an incident acute MI with atrial fibrillation among patients who had chronic kidney disease of all severities, according to a report published online March 4 in JAMA.

In a prospective nationwide cohort study involving 24,317 such patients in Sweden, warfarin provided this benefit without raising the risk of bleeding during 1 year of follow-up. Approximately half of the study participants had CKD of stage 3 or higher. Only 22% were given warfarin at hospital discharge, said Juan Jesus Carrero, Ph.D., of the Center for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, and his associates.

During follow-up, there were 9,002 composite endpoint events: 3,551 deaths, 4,573 recurrent MIs, and 878 ischemic strokes. Across all categories of CKD severity, patients taking warfarin had 5.8% fewer deaths, 2.2% fewer MIs, and 1.8% fewer ischemic strokes than those not taking warfarin. Yet the relative risk of bleeding events was not significantly higher with warfarin, regardless of the severity of CKD, the investigators said (JAMA 2014 March 4 [doi:10.1001/jama.2014.1334]).

These findings refute the results of some earlier observational studies in which warfarin therapy raised the risk of death or stroke in severe CKD, which prompted a modification of treatment guidelines. Ironically, patients with CKD potentially have the most to gain from using prophylactic warfarin, since their renal dysfunction puts them at additional risk of stroke and death, Dr. Carrero and his colleagues noted.

This study was supported by the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research. Dr. Carrero reported no potential financial conflicts of interest; his associates reported ties to numerous industry sources.

Recommended Reading

Personalization keys vision of improved atrial fib care
MDedge Internal Medicine
CoreValve holds size advantage for U.S. TAVR
MDedge Internal Medicine
DECAAF published: Assess extent of fibrosis before AF ablation
MDedge Internal Medicine
New tools for stroke prediction in atrial fibrillation
MDedge Internal Medicine
Myocardial fibrosis assessment fine-tunes ICD selection
MDedge Internal Medicine
Ablation edges out drugs for treatment-naive paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
MDedge Internal Medicine
VIDEO: Device detects more atrial fibrillation, but when is intervention necessary?
MDedge Internal Medicine
Continuous AF monitors raise questions about when to intervene
MDedge Internal Medicine
AAN issues nonvalvular atrial fibrillation stroke prevention guideline
MDedge Internal Medicine
Physician/patient communication on ICDs deemed problematic
MDedge Internal Medicine