Conference Coverage

Closed-loop insulin delivery worked at home

View on the News

Who will pay for this?

This is obviously very exciting. Clearly, there are things to be worked out in terms of glucagon, and in general about pump sites (whether it’s insulin or glucagon). We have seen that patients who have been on pumps for 20-25 years get into real problems with their infusion site. The sites get scarred and fibrosed, and absorption becomes poor. I’m concerned about that. We need to do a better job in learning why that is and how we can address the challenges we have with pump sites. That’s a concern that hopefully will be fixable.

There’s a bigger concern here. We’re beginning to add more technology that is certainly going to help people with type 1 diabetes, but who is going to pay for it? Where I live, I am having a very difficult time getting payers to pay for the sensor, let alone what’s going to be required with all of the extra paraphernalia that’s going to come with the sensor and controller. And with the cost of insulin, because we have moved into this accountable care organization culture and mentality, I’m having a hard time even getting insulin for some of these patients. This includes the type 1 diabetes patients.

There’s such a disconnect between what we’re seeing at this meeting and my day-to-day and hour-to-hour struggles with the payers. I get very concerned about how we’re going to connect those dots. My big concern is not the science, not the fact that the technology is improving, but how we are going to pay for it, given how our environment has been changing.

Irl Hirsch, M.D., is professor of medicine and chair of diabetes treatment and teaching at the University of Washington, Seattle. He gave these comments in an interview. Dr. Hirsch reported financial associations with Sanofi, Halozyme, Abbott Laboratories, and Roche.


 

AT THE ADA ANNUAL SCIENTIFIC SESSIONS

Two episodes of severe hypoglycemia occurred while on the closed-loop system, one due to user error and the other for unknown reasons. Both patients made a full recovery, Dr. Thabit said.

Dr. Hood Thabit

The closed-loop system was interrupted unintentionally an average of once every 5 nights, which one physician in the audience called "very impressive."

The separate day-and-night study of 17 adults randomized them to 8 days of either therapy followed by a 1- to 3-week washout period and then 8 days on the other therapy. Again, patients received a day of training at a research facility before using the closed-loop system at home.

During the 7 days of home use with the closed-loop system, patients spent significantly less time in hyperglycemia (levels above 10 mmol/L), compared with the control therapy (21% vs. 30% of the time, respectively), reported Dr. Lalantha Leelarathna, also of the University of Cambridge. Time spent in hypoglycemia did not differ significantly between groups.

Mean glucose levels were significantly lower while patients were on the closed-loop system (8.1 mmol/L) than on the sensor-augmented pump (8.8 mmol/L), he said.

The closed-loop system was interrupted unintentionally every 12 hours on average, mainly because the pump was not connected, the continuous glucose monitor was unavailable, or the user changed pump settings. Two severe hypoglycemic episodes occurred, one during use of the closed-loop system and one during the crossover period. Both patients recovered fully. Four episodes of high glucose because of failure of the insulin infusion set did not lead to ketosis or hospitalization.

"We need to improve portability and connectivity between devices," Dr. Leelarathna said.

Dr. Lalantha Leelarathna

The Artificial Pancreas at Home (AP@home) consortium next will test the system in a 3-monthy study of day-and-night use by 30 adults with type 1 diabetes, compared with optimized sensor-augmented pump therapy, Dr. Leelarathna said.

Previous studies conducted exclusively in clinical research facilities have shown that closed-loop insulin delivery systems can improve glucose control, but these are among the first studies to show that they may do the same when used by patients at home.

Dr. Leelarathna and Dr. Thabit reported having no financial disclosures.

sboschert@frontlinemedcom.com

On Twitter @sherryboschert

Pages

Recommended Reading

Diabetes risk declines as diet quality improves
MDedge Internal Medicine
VIDEO: ACC/AHA lipid guidelines and diabetes
MDedge Internal Medicine
Diabetes found in 17% of MI patients in registry
MDedge Internal Medicine
Bionic pancreas beat standard insulin pump in type 1 diabetes
MDedge Internal Medicine
Novel combination drug IDegLira boosts glycemic control
MDedge Internal Medicine
Weight loss greater with higher-dose liraglutide in diabetes
MDedge Internal Medicine
Fatty heart may bring on diabetes
MDedge Internal Medicine
Cancer risk elevated before and 90 days after diabetes diagnosis
MDedge Internal Medicine
U.S. diabetes epidemic may be slowing
MDedge Internal Medicine
Insulin independence achieved with novel stem cell therapy
MDedge Internal Medicine