The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force says that women between ages 65 and 75 years who have smoked 100 or more cigarettes in their lives could benefit from one-time ultrasonography screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA).
The AAA guidelines replace those published by USPSTS in 2005, which had recommended against screening in women regardless of smoking history.
The new guidelines, published online June 23 in Annals of Internal Medicine (doi:10.7326/M14-1204), do not recommend screening in women who have never smoked, citing the very low prevalence of AAA in this group.
Nevertheless, the task force’s systematic review, led by current chair Dr. Michael L. LeFevre of the University of Missouri in Columbia, revealed that screening in women aged 65-75 years who have smoked or currently smoke – a group for which AAA prevalence is between 0.8% and 2% – could potentially be beneficial, though current evidence remains insufficient to recommend it.
"Prevalence of AAA in women who currently smoke approaches that of men who have never smoked," Dr. LeFevre and his colleagues wrote in the guidelines. "As such, a small net benefit might exist for this population and appropriate, high-quality research designs should be used to address this question."
The task force continues to recommend that men between the ages of 65 and 75 years who have ever smoked be offered one-time screening with ultrasonography for AAA. Men in this age group who have never smoked may be offered screening if they have certain risk factors, such as advanced age or a family history of AAA.
AAA – a dilation in the wall of the abdominal section of the aorta of 3 cm or larger – is seen in 4% and 7% of men and about 1% of women over the age of 50, USPSTF said. Most AAAs remain asymptomatic until they rupture, in which case the mortality risk has been shown to be higher than 75%. Women who develop AAA tend to do so at a later age than do men, the task force noted, with most ruptures occurring past age 80 years.
The task force is a voluntary advisory body independent of the U.S. government but supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. One of the study’s coauthors, Dr. Douglas Owens of the Stanford (Calif.) University, disclosed travel support from the agency during the course of the review. The other task force members declared no conflicts of interest.