Clinical Review

Esophageal Cancer: Current Diagnosis and Management


 

References

In a prospective nonrandomized study of 13 patients with polyflex stents (polyester mesh stents covered in a silicone membrane) placed prior to neoadjuvant therapy, similar improvements with dysphagia scores were observed after stent placement [70]. In the study, the mean baseline dysphagia score at the time of stent placement was 3. Dysphagia scores were subsequently obtained at 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks after stent placement and were 1.1, 0.8, 0.9, and 1.0, respectively ( P = 0.005, P = 0.01, P = 0.02, and P = 0.008, respectively). There were no episodes of bleeding or esophageal perforation. Immediate complications from stenting included chest discomfort, seen in 12 of the 13 patients. Stent migration occurred at some point in 6 of 13 patients, although not all patients with a migrated stent required stent replacement. Again, it was thought that the stent migration could be a sign of tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy.

Surgery

Surgery is an essential part of treatment of esophageal cancer [3,71]. Transthoracic, transhiatal, and radical (en bloc) are the 3 different basic approaches for esophagectomy [3]. Because it does not require a thoracotomy, the transhiatal approach has a theoretical advantage of decreased morbidity and mortality, although several studies have shown no differences in outcome between the transthoracic and transhiatal approach [3,72,73]. In a study by Chang et al comparing the transhiatal to the transthoracic approach, the 5-year survival was higher for patients undergoing transhiatal versus transthoracic esophagectomy (30.5% vs. 22.7%, P = 0.02) [73]. However, after adjusting for differences in tumor stage and patient and provider factors the survival advantage was no longer statistically significant (adjusted HR for mortality, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.20).

Adjuvant Therapy

Despite the benefits of chemoradiation as a neoadjuvant treatment, the data for chemoradiation as adjuvant therapy after resection is lacking in most clinical situations [74].

Metastatic Disease

Between 25% and 40% of esophageal cancer patients will present with metastases to liver, bone, and lung or widespread nodal metastases [61].Improvement of quality of life is a major goal in patients with unresectable disease. Patients with nonsurgical esophageal cancer who have an estimated life expectancy of greater than a few weeks are recommended to have concurrent chemoradiotherapy as most patients have symptomatic obstructive disease and dysphagia [62]. A study by Harvey et al examined the palliative benefit of chemoradiotherapy on dysphagia versus toxicity in patients with invasive esophageal carcinoma [75]. The study found that treatment was well tolerated, with only 5% of patients failing to complete treatment. The study used the DeMeester (4-point) symptom scores for the assessment of dysphagia. The median baseline score at presentation was 2 (moderate: difficulty with soft food, predominately liquid diet). After chemoradiotherapy, 49% of patients were assessed as having a dysphagia score of 0 (no dysphagia). Of those patients who received chemoradiotherapy, 78% had an improvement of at least 1 grade in their DeMeester dysphagia, while only 14% of patients did not improve with therapy. The median survival for the study population was 7 months, with a 6% treatment-related mortality. Chemoradiation therapy as a primary treatment for dysphagia can take days to weeks to take effect, and can be associated with significant pain, usually from radiation esophagitis.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Sequential and Concomitant Therapies for <em>Helicobacter pylori </em>Eradication
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Diagnosis and Management of Chronic or Recurrent Functional Abdominal Pain in Children: A Biopsychosocial Approach
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management