Conference Coverage

A blood biomarker for MS: Coming to clinics soon?


 

EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM ACTRIMS FORUM 2019

Correlation with outcomes

At the group level, patients with MS have higher levels of NfL, compared with controls, and levels are higher in patients with progressive forms of MS versus relapsing forms. “Levels increase dramatically in the wake of relapse,” he said.

Barro et al. found that patients with higher serum levels of NfL are more likely to experience Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) worsening (Brain. 2018 Aug 1;141[8]:2382-91). Furthermore, MRI lesions are independently associated with serum NfL, and patients with higher levels of serum NfL have significantly greater average loss in brain volume and spinal cord volume over 5 years.

A treatment algorithm

NfL someday could be incorporated into MS treatment algorithms, Dr. Leppert suggested. For instance, if a patient has high levels of disease activity based on MRI or clinical grounds, then prescribe a high-efficacy therapy. If not, measure NfL. “If the levels are low, then you can be assured to use platform therapies or continue what the patient has. But if NfL levels are high, then you should choose high efficacious therapies or switch to high-efficacious therapies in the long run,” he said.

Limitations and next steps

Although NfL is a specific marker of neuronal damage, it is not specific for the cause of the damage. Further studies are needed to better understand NfL metabolism and confounding factors such as age. Reference biomarkers likely will be needed “to conceptualize whether the signal of NfL is due to acute disease or chronic disease,” Dr. Leppert said.

“We need to optimize the assay and come to a worldwide agreement on the platform. We need to have prospective studies, mainly to achieve regulatory acceptance. And we need to have a normative database” to determine which NfL values are pathologic at a particular age, he said.

Despite the biomarker’s potential, blood NfL levels will not replace clinical expertise. “Biomarkers cannot be of value without a clinical backing and a clinical evaluation,” Dr. Leppert said. “The idea that this will replace us or any other person who makes a clinical judgment is a big error. NfL will prevail as a biomarker. ... But interpretation of the clinical background is germane.”

Dr. Leppert has been an employee of pharmaceutical companies, most recently Novartis.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Early intensive treatment of MS may benefit patients
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Large survey reveals that few MS patients have long-term care insurance
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Incidence of treated depression nearly 100% higher in patients with MS
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Migraine associated with more severe disability in patients with MS
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
MS research: “Our patients can’t wait” for conventional techniques
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
MS prevalence estimates reach highest point to date
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Which comorbidities most diminish quality of life in patients with MS?
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Sex differences in MS: It’s the chromosomes, not just the hormones
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
New data bolster latitude’s association with MS prevalence
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
FDA approves siponimod for relapsing forms of MS
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management