Feature

Survey: High costs lead to skipped or postponed health care


 

Half of all Americans with employer-sponsored health benefits say that they or someone in their family has skipped or postponed care because of the cost, according to a survey by the Kaiser Family Foundation and the Los Angeles Times.

Health care that was skipped or postponed because of cost

That number changes, however, when chronic conditions are considered. In the survey of Americans covered by employer-sponsored health insurance, 60% of those with a family member who had a chronic condition said that cost had altered the care of someone in the family over the previous 12 months, compared with 40% of those who had no chronic condition in their family, the KFF and L.A. Times noted in their report.

More specifically, families with an individual who had a chronic condition were more likely to put off or postpone needed care (42% vs. 23%) and to rely on home remedies or OTC drugs instead of visiting a physician (41% vs. 28%) than were families without chronic conditions, the report’s authors said.

When asked about the affordability of their health care, 49% of those in families with a chronic health condition said they had a problem paying for their coverage in the past year, compared with 29% of respondents in families with no chronic condition.

“Drilling down into the consequences of these affordability problems reveals more about the financial burden of health care on families with chronic conditions,” compared with those without chronic conditions: cut back spending on food, clothes, household items (35% vs. 16%); used up all or most of their savings (26% vs. 11%); and borrowed money from friends or family (14% vs. 6%), according to the researchers.

Although respondents felt “that the cost of health care for people like them is too high, more say the current U.S. health insurance system works well for people with employer coverage than say it works well for people on Medicare or Medicaid or those who purchase their own insurance. Asked who is to blame for high costs, majorities point the finger at pharmaceutical and insurance companies, while fewer see hospitals, doctors, or employers as deserving of blame,” the KFF and L.A. Times investigators wrote.

The survey involved a sample of 1,407 adults aged 18-64 years and was conducted from Sept. 25 through Oct. 9, 2018. The margin of the sampling error is ±3 percentage points.

Recommended Reading

Gaps exist in rotavirus vaccination coverage in young U.S. children
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Report: Part B funds stable, hospital trust running out
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Navigating the Oncology Care Model
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Depression treatment rates rose with expanded insurance coverage
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Pretrial screening panels: Do they reduce frivolous claims?
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Statute of limitations in malpractice actions
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
CMS pushing primary care with two new payment models
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
CMS proposes payment increase for administering CAR T in the hospital
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Consider varying generational needs, preferences in the workplace and with patients
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
CBO predicts more Medicare spending with drug rebate proposal
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management