From the Journals

Could an osteoporosis drug reduce need for hip revision surgery?


 

Older polyethylene prostheses are the main culprit

Commenting further on the study, Dr. Chen noted that osteolysis still plagues orthopedic surgeons because the original polyethylene prostheses were not very good. A better prosthesis developed at Massachusetts General Hospital is made up of highly crossed-link polyethylene and still wears over time but to a much lesser extent than the older polyethylene prostheses.

Metal and ceramic prostheses also can induce osteolysis, but again to a much lesser extent than the older polyethylene implants.

“Any particle can technically cause osteolysis but plastic produces the most particles,” Dr. Chen explained. Although hip revision rates in the United States are low to begin with, aseptic loosening is still one of the main reasons that patients need to undergo revision surgery, she observed.

“A lot of patients are still living with the old plastic [implants] so there is still a need for something like this,” she stressed.

However, many questions about this potential new strategy remain to be answered, including when best to initiate treatment and how to manage patients at risk for osteolysis 20-30 years after they have received their original implant.

In his editorial, Dr. Aro said that serious adverse consequences often become evident 10-20 years after patients have undergone the original hip replacement procedures, when they are potentially less physically fit than they were at the time of the operation and thus less able to withstand the rigors of a difficult revision surgery.

“In this context, the concept of nonsurgical pharmacological treatment of periprosthetic osteolysis ... brings a new hope for the ever-increasing population of patients with total hip arthroplasty to avoid revision surgery,” Dr. Aro suggested.

However, Dr. Aro cautioned that reduction of bone turnover by antiresorptive agents such as denosumab has been associated with the development of atypical femoral fractures.

The study was funded by Amgen. Dr. Wilkinson has reported receiving a grant from Amgen. Dr. Chen has reported serving as a consultant for Striker and b-One Ortho. Dr. Aro has reported receiving a grant to his institution from Amgen Finland and the Academy of Finland. He has also served as a member of an advisory scientific board for Amgen Finland.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Societies offer advice on treating osteoporosis patients during pandemic
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
ACR gives guidance on rheumatic disease management during pandemic
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Medical societies advise on vitamin D in midst of COVID-19
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Older adults often underestimate ability to prevent falls
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Low vitamin D linked to increased COVID-19 risk
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Fracture risk prediction: No benefit to repeat BMD testing in postmenopausal women
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Mega vitamin D harms bone in women, not men, without osteoporosis
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Reassuring rheumatic disease patients on value of bisphosphonates
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Osteoporosis drugs don’t worsen COVID-19 risk, may help
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
To D or not to D? Vitamin D doesn’t reduce falls in older adults
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management