Outcomes Research in Review

Evaluation of a Digital Intervention for Hypertension Management in Primary Care Combining Self-monitoring of Blood Pressure With Guided Self-management


 

References

There are many important strengths of this study, especially related to the design and analysis strategy, and some limitations. This study was designed as a randomized controlled trial with a 1 year follow-up period, although participants were unmasked to the group they were randomized to, which may have impacted their behaviors while in the study. As the authors state, the study was not only adequately powered to detect a difference in blood pressure, but also over-recruitment ensured such an effect was not missed. Recruiting from a large number of general practices ensured generalizability in terms of health care professionals. Importantly, while study participants mostly identified as predominantly White and tended to be of higher socioeconomic status, this is representative of the aged population in England and Wales. Nevertheless, generalizability of findings from this study is still limited to the demographic characteristics of the study population. Other strengths included inclusion of intention-to-treat analysis, multiple imputation for missing data, sensitivity analysis, as well as economic analysis and cost effectiveness analysis.

Of note, results from the study are only attributable to the digital interventions used in this study (digital web-based with limited mechanisms of behavior change and engagement built-in) and thus should not be generalized to all digital interventions for managing hypertension. Also, as the authors highlight, the relative importance of the different parts of the digital intervention were unable to be distinguished, although this type of analysis is important in multicomponent interventions to better understand the most effective mechanism impacting change in the primary outcome.

Applications for Clinical Practice

Results of this study demonstrated that among participants being treated with hypertension, those engaged with the HOME BP digital intervention (combining self-monitoring of blood pressure with guided self-management) had better control of systolic BP after 1 year compared to participants receiving usual care. While these findings have important implications in the management of hypertension in health care systems, its integration into clinical workflow, sustainability, long-term clinical effectiveness, and effectiveness among diverse populations is unclear. However, clinicians can still encourage and support the use of evidence-based digital tools for patient self-monitoring of BP and guided-management of lifestyle modifications to lower BP. Additionally, clinicians can proactively propose incorporating evidence-based digital interventions like HOME BP into routine clinical practice guidelines.

Financial disclosures: None.

Pages

Recommended Reading

New European guidelines on CVD prevention
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Growing proportion of cardiac arrests in U.S. considered opioid related
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
‘Quadpill’ bests monotherapy for initial BP lowering: QUARTET
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Feds slap UPMC, lead cardiothoracic surgeon with fraud lawsuit
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Cavernous gender gap in Medicare payments to cardiologists
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Weight-loss surgery linked to fewer cardiovascular events, more so with RYGB
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Texts boost activity, quality of life in patients with heart failure and diabetes
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
COVID vaccine preprint study prompts Twitter outrage
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
A new weight loss threshold for T2d remission after bariatric surgery?
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
New AHA guidance targets obesity-related hypertension
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management