News

New test showed promise in ocular myasthenia gravis

View on the News

Another candidate for diagnosing myasthenia gravis

Autoimmune myasthenia gravis (MG) commonly presents with fatigable ptosis and diplopia. In isolation, these symptoms often herald the restricted form of the disease known as ocular MG. In some cases, ocular MG progresses to involve bulbar musculature as well as limb muscles. Because some individuals with myasthenia have the signs intermittently or may never have ptosis, the diagnosis is sometimes difficult to ascertain on clinical grounds alone.

Clinical and laboratory tests available for confirming the diagnosis have been in use for many years, as well as some recent refinements. These include serologic testing for acetylcholine receptor and MuSK antibodies; the edrophonium (Tensilon) test in which an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor is delivered intravenously to temporarily improve ptosis and diplopia; slow repetitive (electrical) nerve stimulation (RNS), particularly of proximal limb and facial nerves and single fiber electromyography (SFEMG). Each of these approaches has limitations. Antibody testing has relatively low sensitivity (in the range of 0.50-0.71 for ocular MG and 0.87-0.98 for generalized MG). For RNS, the sensitivity numbers are even less positive (0.11-0.39 for ocular MG and 0.53-0.98 for generalized MG). Even though the edrophonium test is said to have a sensitivity of 0.60-0.90, this procedure has largely fallen into disuse among neuromuscular specialists partly because of the risks of bradycardia, syncope, and even asystole, as well as high rates of false positivity. Some neurologists use an icepack on the forehead as a diagnostic substitute or so-called “poor man’s edrophonium test,” although false positive rates are considerable. SFEMG is considered the most sensitive diagnostic test for MG (sensitivity of 0.62-1.0 in ocular MG and 0.75-0.98 in generalized MG) but is technically demanding, time consuming, available almost exclusively in academic centers, and until relatively recently meant using expensive SFEMG needle electrodes requiring sterilization and periodic sharpening.

Dr. Benn E. Smith

Two recent publications have introduced advances in the diagnosis of MG. The first is a report by Dr. Erik Stålberg and colleagues from Sweden, the United States, United Kingdom, Slovenia, Norway, Brazil, and Spain of normative data for concentric SFEMG using both the stimulated and the volitional techniques in the extensor digitorum, frontalis, and orbicularis oculi muscles from 59 to 92 subjects for each muscle (Muscle Nerve. 2016 Mar;53[3]:351-62). The value of this set of reference data is that neurologists who perform SFEMG now have a rigorously collected reliable set of statistically validated normal values using commercially available concentric needle electrodes as conventional single fiber needle electrodes are becoming more and more challenging to use in practice.

A second publication by Yulia Valko and colleagues from Zurich and Sydney describes the novel application of ocular vestibular myogenic potentials (oVEMP) as a new form of RNS in MG. By delivering 4-ms bursts of 500-Hz bone conducted vibration in trains of 10 stimuli and recording just below the inferior orbital rim with surface electrodes, the investigators found that a frequency of 20 Hz resulted in the cleanest separation of tracings in subjects with documented MG from age- and gender-matched healthy controls. The oVEMP technique has been in use for evaluating vestibular disorders for more than 10 years and is an accepted diagnostic technique for this purpose. While this novel approach also shows promise as a candidate diagnostic technique in evaluating extraocular neuromuscular junction dysfunction, further prospective studies are needed. By comparing the sensitivity and specificity of oVEMP RNS with that of accepted diagnostic tests, including conventional facial RNS and SFEMG, in subjects suspected of having MG, the neurology and neuromuscular communities will be in a better position to judge whether oVEMP will one day be an accepted diagnostic test for MG.

Dr. Benn E. Smith is with the department of neurology at the Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz. He has no relevant disclosures.


 

FROM NEUROLOGY

References

A test for ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMP) had a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 64% for detecting myasthenia gravis (MG), according to a case-control study of 55 adults published online in Neurology.

“The presence of an oVEMP decrement is a sensitive and specific marker for MG,” said Dr. Yulia Valko at University Hospital Zurich in Switzerland and her associates. “This test allows direct and noninvasive examination of extraocular muscle activity, with similarly good diagnostic accuracy in ocular and generalized MG.”

Myasthenia gravis usually manifests first in the eyes, and early diagnosis and treatment can limit generalization. But nearly half of patients remain undiagnosed a year after onset, partly because standard tests often fail to detect isolated ocular MG, the researchers noted. The recently developed oVEMP test directly measures the activity of the extraocular inferior oblique muscle in response to repeated bursts of vibratory stimulation to the forehead. A decreased response, or decrement, indicates failed neuromuscular transmission, as with standard repetitive nerve stimulation. The researchers evaluated the test in 13 patients with isolated ocular MG, 14 patients with generalized MG, and 28 healthy controls. They defined the oVEMP decrement as the decrease between the second stimulus and the average of the fifth through ninth stimuli (Neurology. 2016 Jan 20. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002383).

A repetition rate of 20 Hz best differentiated between cases (average decrement, –21.5% plus or minus 29.6%) and controls (–2.8% plus or minus 16.9%), the researchers reported. When at least one eye showed a decrement, the ideal cutoff was a drop of at least 15.2%, which detected MG with a sensitivity of 89% and a sensitivity of 64%. When both eyes were affected, the ideal cutoff for the smallest of the two decrements was at least 20.4%, which yielded a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 63%. For both cutoffs, the test was similarly sensitive for detecting ocular and generalized MG, the investigators noted. For the unilateral cutoff, the sensitivity was 92% for patients with isolated ocular MG and 86% for patients with generalized MG. For the bilateral cutoff, specificity was 62% in ocular MG and 64% in generalized MG.

The results provide class III evidence that oVEMP can distinguish between patients with MG and healthy controls, “but future studies will need to confirm its diagnostic utility in clinical practice, where the main challenge is differentiation from patients with other neuro-opthalmologic conditions,” the researchers said. “The possibility to apply fast repetition rates is one important advantage of oVEMP, which is not possible by measuring voluntary saccadic eye movements. As a consequence, oVEMP allowed us to unmask myasthenic decrements even in clinically asymptomatic eyes,” they added.

Because the study used a confirmed diagnosis of MG as a benchmark, all patients were already being treated with cholinesterase inhibitors, the investigators noted. Although they underwent oVEMP testing in the morning before their first dose of medication, the test needs further study in drug-naïve patients, as well as in patients with worse limitations in their upward gaze, they added.

The study was funded by the University of Zurich, the Betty and David Koetser Foundation for Brain Research, the Albert Bruppacher Foundation for Eye Research, and the OPOS Foundation. The investigators had no relevant disclosures.

Recommended Reading

VIDEO: Ask patients about metal-on-metal hip implants
MDedge Neurology
Experimental vaccine may have worked on Ebola-exposed physician
MDedge Neurology
Celiac disease more than doubles neuropathy risk
MDedge Neurology
VIDEO: Assessment tool rapidly screens lupus cognition
MDedge Neurology
Vaccine-derived polio case presents new challenges to eradication
MDedge Neurology
Recall issued on U.S. Compounding sterile products
MDedge Neurology
Study characterizes injury risk in cervical myelopathy patients
MDedge Neurology
FDA rejects antisense oligonucleotide drug for Duchenne muscular dystrophy
MDedge Neurology
VIDEO: Expert discusses VATS thymectomy for myasthenia gravis
MDedge Neurology
USPSTF: Screen all adults for depression
MDedge Neurology