Hitting a Nerve

Defensive medicine’s stranglehold on the realities of practice


 

It sounds good in principle, but, sadly, the answer is “probably not.”

This is where the idealism of medicine meets the reality of its practice.

In the world of the emergency department, time and resources are limited. Emergency medicine physicians don’t have the luxury of taking a detailed neurologic history, nor are they trained (or expected) to be able to do so. Their job is to decide what is (and isn’t) life-threatening and who does (or doesn’t) need to be admitted.

But probably the main reason why Dr. Topcuoglo and his colleagues’ methodologies will never be implemented is defensive medicine. It’s a heck of lot easier and safer for any doctor – emergency medicine, hospitalist, and neurologist – to admit the patient and order more studies than it is to get served for malpractice and have to defend why you didn’t do that.

Pages

Recommended Reading

AHA and ASA Publish New Ischemic Stroke Guidelines
MDedge Neurology
Mexican Americans With Midlife Stroke May Have Worse Outcomes Than Non-Hispanic Whites
MDedge Neurology
What Is the Impact of Poststroke Cognitive Impairment in Patients With Mild Stroke?
MDedge Neurology
Thrombectomy’s success treating strokes prompts rethinking of selection criteria
MDedge Neurology
EMS Stroke Field Triage Improves Outcomes
MDedge Neurology
Overweight and obese individuals face greater cardiovascular morbidity
MDedge Neurology
Rivaroxaban Plus Aspirin Nearly Halves Ischemic Stroke Risk
MDedge Neurology
Conference News Roundup—American Association for the Advancement of Science
MDedge Neurology
Migraine May Be an Important Risk Factor for Cardiovascular Diseases
MDedge Neurology
Trial shows ‘signals’ in favor of general anesthesia during EVT for stroke
MDedge Neurology