Feature

Verma unveils Medicaid scorecard but refuses to judge efforts


 


“There are significant methodological issues with the underlying data, including completeness, timeliness, and quality,” the association said in a statement. It noted that most of the data come from 2015.

As expected, the data showed great variation in how states provide care, including immunizing teenagers and getting dental care to children. A big reason is that state Medicaid benefits and payments to doctors vary dramatically, the Medicaid directors said, so that “it will not be possible to make apples-to-apples comparisons between states.”

In her first public speech, Ms. Verma promised last November to release a Medicaid scorecard. She said states won’t immediately face any consequences for poor performance – but that could change.

“The data … begins to offer taxpayers insights into how their dollars are being spent and the impact those dollars have on health outcomes,” Ms. Verma said on June 4.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Two more and counting: Suicide in medical trainees
MDedge Neurology
FDA’s Gottlieb floats ideas on Medicare drug coverage
MDedge Neurology
Specialty practices hire more physician assistants and nurse practitioners
MDedge Neurology
Drugmakers blamed for blocking generics have cost U.S. billions
MDedge Neurology
Doctors’ pay involves a lot of unseen work
MDedge Neurology
Postop delirium management proposed as hospital performance measure
MDedge Neurology
MDedge Daily News: Keeping patients summer safe
MDedge Neurology
Peer mentorship, groups help combat burnout in female physicians
MDedge Neurology
Looking for lower Medicare drug costs? Ask your pharmacist for the cash price
MDedge Neurology
AMA: Opioid prescriptions down since 2013
MDedge Neurology