News

Spine Injury Criteria for Children Being Challenged


 

CORONADO, CALIF. — Reports are challenging the validity of the five National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study criteria to diagnose spine injury in children.

The criteria (posterior midline cervical tenderness; no evidence of intoxication; normal level of alertness; no focal neurologic deficit; and no painful, distracting injury) were established in a study of 34,069 trauma victims (N. Engl. J. Med. 2000;343:94–9). Of these, 818 (2.4%) had cervical spine injury.

The researchers reported the criteria were 99% sensitive for cervical spine injury and 99.6% sensitive for clinically significant cervical spine injury in adults. Specificity was 12.9% in both groups.

In a subset analysis of 3,065 children from the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) study, 30 had cervical spine injuries (Pediatrics 2001;108:E20). The NEXUS criteria for detecting cervical spine injury were 100% sensitive and only 19.9% specific. However, none of the children studied were less than 2 years old and only 817 (27%) were younger than age 8 years.

“Until we come up with pediatric-specific criteria, it's reasonable to apply the NEXUS criteria to awake and alert patients,” Dr. Julie C. Leonard said at a meeting sponsored by the American College of Emergency Physicians. “However, if you have a high index of suspicion by either mechanism or self-reported pain, you should use your clinical acumen.”

A recent 20-year review that applied the NEXUS criteria to 190 children with cervical spine injury found the criteria were 94% sensitive among children aged less than 8 and 100% sensitive in those older than 8 (Neurosurgery 2008;62:700–8). A Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network study found the NEXUS criteria were 83% sensitive among 539 children with spinal injury who presented to the emergency department. Of the 90 children missed by the NEXUS criteria, 58 (64%) were younger than 8 years of age.

Dr. Leonard, of Washington University, St. Louis, said a risk-stratification system is needed. High-risk populations also must be considered, like those with Down syndrome or juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Dr. Leonard disclosed no conflicts.

Recommended Reading

Baseline Intelligence Best Predicts TBI Outcome
MDedge Neurology
Blast-Induced Brain Trauma Inflicts Heavy Emotional Wound
MDedge Neurology
First Face Transplant Has Encouraging Outcomes
MDedge Neurology
Study Highlights Dire Lack of Emergency On-Call Specialists
MDedge Neurology
Dire TBI Outcome Data Reflect Poor Methods
MDedge Neurology
Image of the Month
MDedge Neurology
Two New Studies Aim to Reduce Infant Head Trauma
MDedge Neurology
Small-Fiber Dysfunction May Be the Key to Pain Syndrome
MDedge Neurology
Biomarker May Help Predict The Severity of Brain Trauma
MDedge Neurology
Botulinum Toxin Relaxes Muscles In Cerebral Upper Limb Spasticity
MDedge Neurology