News

State Laws Vary on Seizure-Impaired Driving


 

SEATTLE — States vary widely as to whether they legally require physicians to report patients whose driving may be impaired because of seizures, and whether they provide reporting physicians any legal protection, a new study shows.

Physicians across specialties often encounter patients with seizure disorders and they may be unsure of their legal obligation to report such patients to the state's department of motor vehicles, said Dr. Michael C. Harlow, a forensic psychiatrist at the University of South Dakota, Sioux Falls.

Dr. Harlow and his colleagues searched legal and medical databases in an effort to identify statutory and case law in all 50 states and the District of Columbia regarding physician reporting of driving-impaired seizure patients.

All states allow physicians to report patients who are impaired to drive because of seizures, but only six of them—California, Delaware, Nevada, New Jersey, Oregon, and Pennsylvania—mandate it, Dr. Harlow said at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.

About half of the states do not provide relevant legal protections to reporting physicians, a fact that may discourage some physicians from reporting, Dr. Harlow noted.

Only 22 states legally protect physicians from disciplinary action for breaking physician-patient confidentiality in order to report a driving-impaired seizure patient.

And only 26 states provide reporting physicians with liability immunity from third parties if the reported patient has a motor vehicle accident that results in injuries or death.

“What is interesting is that some of the states that have mandatory reporting don't provide full legal protection to the physician doing the reporting,” Dr. Harlow commented. “So that puts the physician in a quandary.”

For example, although the state of New Jersey requires physicians to report driving-impaired seizure patients, it does not protect the physician for breach of confidentiality under that circumstance.

There also is a variety of definitions as to what activates a reporting statute, Dr. Harlow observed. Some of the six states specify seizures, whereas others use a broader definition of a medical condition that can cause loss of consciousness, such as diabetes or cardiovascular disease.

There also is marked variation in the penalties for failure to report in these states, Dr. Harlow noted.

Three of those states have no penalties, two have civil penalties, and one—Nevada—classifies failure to report as a misdemeanor offense.

In other words, physicians could face criminal charges.

Whether physicians follow these state statutes is another question. Data from California suggest that many physicians do not report patients with seizures despite the state's stringent statute.

And in legal cases testing the issue, California courts have thus far drawn distinctions based on the nature of the physician's relationship with the patient, he noted.

“If you are a physician treating a patient for a broken arm and realize that they have a neurologic condition, but you are not their neurologist and you don't report them, and they go off and [have an accident], then you are not liable,” Dr. Harlow explained.

However, if “you are the treating neurologist, then you would have a problem potentially under the law,” he added.

Dr. Harlow reported that he had no conflicts of interest in association with the study.

Recommended Reading

Medicaid Costs May Outpace U.S. Economy Soon
MDedge Neurology
New State Relicensing Policy Being Considered
MDedge Neurology
Policy & Practice
MDedge Neurology
Policy & Practice
MDedge Neurology
CBO Examines Cost of Health Policy Changes
MDedge Neurology
Details of 2009 PQRI Measures Now Online
MDedge Neurology
Deadline for ICD-10 Transition Is Set for 2013
MDedge Neurology
Policy & Practice
MDedge Neurology
PQRI Will Use Lessons From 2007 to Improve
MDedge Neurology
Policy & Practice
MDedge Neurology