News

Class Action Is Likely to Help MDs Recoup Income


 

Physicians frustrated with seemingly arbitrarily denied claims will have their day in court later this year with at least six insurers, thanks to a recent Supreme Court decision to deny the plans' appeal of a class action suit.

But settlements related to improper denials by Cigna and Aetna are likely to provide vindication even sooner.

The legal actions affect almost every practicing physician in the United States—approximately 900,000 doctors.

A series of suits, originally filed by several state and county medical societies, was consolidated in a U.S. District Court in Florida in 2000 and certified as a class action in 2002. The filing named Aetna, Anthem, Cigna, Coventry, HealthNet, Humana, PacifiCare, Prudential, UnitedHealthcare, and WellPoint as defendants.

The class action lawsuits alleged that the plans violated the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) by engaging in fraud and extortion in a common scheme to wrongfully deny payment to doctors.

Aetna and Cigna broke off and entered into negotiations, an enormous process involving more than 100 attorneys, 19 state and county medical societies, the American Medical Association, and the plans' CEOs.

The two insurers settled in 2003, but the other parties have vowed to continue to fight, and are scheduled for trial in September in the Florida courtroom of Judge Federico Moreno.

Another suit, with 60 Blue Cross and Blue Shield plans as defendants, is also before Judge Moreno.

Still, those other insurers could possibly follow in Aetna and Cigna's footsteps.

The Aetna claims deadline has passed, and physicians had until Feb. 18 to make a claim against Cigna, with two options for recouping losses.

One was to make a general claim on Cigna's $30 million settlement pot, which will be divided equally among all who make such a claim.

Or, physicians could reconstruct claims and seek repayment according to either a general amount per CPT code or a more specific amount based on a complete medical record.

Physicians who did not meet that deadline will still reap the benefits of the settlement, according to David McKenzie, reimbursement director at the American College of Emergency Physicians, who explained the various options to physicians at a recent ACEP meeting in Orlando, Fla.

Aetna agreed to set aside $300 million for prospective relief, and Cigna agreed to a $400 million figure. These amounts represent what is likely to be paid to physicians now that the two insurers have also agreed to a number of changes in business practices.

For instance, both Cigna and Aetna have agreed to pay for vaccines and their administration.

And the insurers will no longer automatically downcode evaluation and management codes, and will separately identify and pay modifier -25, which allows physicians to bill for evaluation and management service on the same day as a procedure. Other coding and editing changes will also lead to future income for physicians.

Both insurers agreed to disclose physician fee schedules and to change the schedules only once a year. Aetna's schedules were posted on a Web site, and Cigna agreed initially to post schedules via e-mail.

Both also said they would make a preadjudication tool available so physicians could determine in advance what they might be paid for a claim.

Clean claims have to be paid within 15 days, whether submitted electronically or on paper. Aetna agreed to pay interest at the lesser rate of prime or 8%, and Cigna agreed to 6%.

A dispute resolution process was established to ensure that Cigna and Aetna are complying with the settlement agreements—in fact, three external independent review boards are monitoring the situation.

Another result of the settlement: Cigna and Aetna agreed to endow two nonprofit foundations devoted to improving medical practice.

The year-old foundations are currently seeking grant proposals. Aetna put $20 million into the Physicians' Foundation for Health Systems Excellence, and Cigna contributed $15 million to the Physicians' Foundation for Health Systems Innovations.

For more on the foundations, go to www.physiciansfoundation.org

Recommended Reading

Policy & Practice
MDedge Neurology
Council Crafts Plan to Accredit Subspecialties
MDedge Neurology
Policy & Practice
MDedge Neurology
FDA's New Drug Safety Board Under Scrutiny : Critics say board may lack independence and authority and may not have sufficient resources.
MDedge Neurology
'Face-to-Face' DME Prescribing Proposal Annoys Neurologists
MDedge Neurology
Seize the Stent: New Carotid Guidelines Set : Neurovascular specialties have banded together to develop training and credentialing standards.
MDedge Neurology
Policy & Practice
MDedge Neurology