Literature Review

Abatacept Fails to Provide Benefits in Relapsing MS


 

References

Abatacept does not reduce the number of new gadolinium-enhancing lesions on MRI in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS), according to results from the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase II ACCLAIM study published online ahead of print August 1 in Multiple Sclerosis.

In the ACCLAIM (A Cooperative Clinical Study of Abatacept in MS) study, 42 patients who received abatacept (Orencia) developed a mean of 0.43 new gadolinium-enhancing lesions by week 24, compared with 1.66 lesions for 20 placebo-treated patients. None of the secondary MRI end points (ie, lesion volume change and percent brain volume change) and clinical end points (ie, changes in MS Functional Composite score, Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS], and annualized relapse rate) at 24 weeks differed significantly between the groups. The rate of patients who met criteria for no evidence of disease activity or its components (ie, no EDSS progression, no clinical exacerbations, and no new gadolinium-enhancing MRI lesion) from week 8 and before week 28 did not differ between the groups.

During a 28-week extension phase in which the groups switched treatments, patients who switched from abatacept to placebo had a greater number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions than did those who switched from placebo to abatacept (1.25 vs 0.60, respectively), but the difference was not statistically significant.

Abatacept, which is approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and juvenile idiopathic arthritis, is a CTLA4 immunoglobulin fusion protein that inhibits the activation of T lymphocytes by blocking the CD28-B7 costimulatory pathway. It was thought to have potential to reduce immune-mediated disease activity in relapsing-remitting MS because T lymphocytes have been implicated in its pathogenesis.

The investigators closed enrollment for the trial early because of slow accrual. The 65 patients who were enrolled in the trial were about half of the population considered to be required (ie, 123) to demonstrate a treatment effect of 50% reduction of new gadolinium-enhancing MRI lesions.

Samia J. Khoury, MD

The number of participants "was too small to demonstrate efficacy at the 50% level," said Samia J. Khoury, MD, senior neurologist at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, and her colleagues. "Low numbers of new gadolinium-enhancing MRI lesions in the study population reduced the chances of demonstrating a treatment effect for abatacept." A prior phase II trial of abatacept that was stopped early as a result of safety events yielded inconclusive results because of an imbalance in the participants' baseline disease activity.

Jeff Evans

Recommended Reading

Real-world MS relapse rate is low for dimethyl fumarate
ICYMI Multiple Sclerosis
Frederick Munschauer, MD
ICYMI Multiple Sclerosis
Choosing MS Treatments From the Therapeutic Armamentarium
ICYMI Multiple Sclerosis
Ocrelizumab May Be More Effective for Relapsing-Remitting MS Than Interferon
ICYMI Multiple Sclerosis
Can Stem Cells Halt Progression of MS?
ICYMI Multiple Sclerosis
Siponimod shows promise through 24 months in relapsing-remitting MS
ICYMI Multiple Sclerosis
Peter Chin, MD
ICYMI Multiple Sclerosis
Is Biotin an Effective Treatment for Progressive MS?
ICYMI Multiple Sclerosis
Abatacept fails to provide benefit in relapsing-remitting MS
ICYMI Multiple Sclerosis
Harold Moses Jr, MD
ICYMI Multiple Sclerosis

Related Articles