Article

Comparing Adherence Rates for MS Treatments


 

References

Intramuscular interferon beta-1 was the first-line MS treatment with the highest adherence rate; natalizumab was the second-line treatment with the highest adherence rate and it had the lowest rate of patients switching to a third drug, researchers found.

SAN ANTONIO—Patients may adhere more to intramuscular (IM) interferon beta-1a than to other first-line disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS), according to a study presented at the 24th Annual Meeting of the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers.

“These results may be attributable to less frequent administration required for IM interferon beta-1a,” reported Rachel Halpern, PhD, of i3 Innovus, Eden Prairie, Minnesota, and colleagues. “Multiple factors are considered when selecting a first-line DMT for MS; given the importance of adherence in the management of MS, adherence should be one of those factors.”

Dr. Halpern’s team also performed analyses on second-line treatments and found that natalizumab was associated with the highest rate of patient adherence and the lowest rate of patients who switched to a third treatment. Like IM interferon beta-1a, natalizumab requires relatively infrequent administration.

The first-line and second-line studies were based on medical and pharmacy claims data and included both unadjusted analyses and regression analyses with adjustment for demographic and pre-index clinical characteristics. Adherence was defined as a medication-possession ratio of at least 80%, and persistence was defined as the “number of days until the earlier of last DMT claim before a minimum 60-day gap in therapy or last DMT claim during postindex.”

First-Line Treatments

The first-line study included 2,305 patients initiating treatment by taking IM interferon beta-1a once weekly, 894 taking subcutaneous (SC) interferon beta-1b every other day, 2,270 taking glatiramer acetate daily, and 1,211 taking SC interferon beta-1a three times weekly.

The unadjusted adherence rates were 62.3% for IM interferon beta-1a, 52.2% for SC interferon beta-1b, 55.4% for glatiramer acetate, and 58.5% for SC interferon beta-1a. Compared with IM interferon beta-1a, all the other treatments had significantly lower adjusted odds of adherence, at 0.66 for SC interferon beta-1b, 0.75 for glatiramer acetate, and 0.84 for SC interferon beta-1a.

The number of mean persistence days was 508 for IM interferon beta-1a, 482 for SC interferon beta-1b, and 471 for both glatiramer acetate and SC interferon beta-1a. In addition, the regression-adjusted persistence failure ratio of SC interferon beta-1a relative to IM interferon beta-1a was significantly high, at 1.12.

Second-Line Treatments

Second-line treatment analyses included 288 patients taking natalizumab, 429 taking IM interferon beta-1a, 415 taking SC interferon beta-1b, 1,067 taking glatiramer acetate, and 872 taking SC interferon beta-1a. Among these groups, the unadjusted adherence rates were 74.7% for natalizumab, 60.8% for IM interferon beta-1a, 55.4% for SC interferon beta-1b, 54.6% for glatiramer acetate, and 60.3% for SC interferon beta-1a. Adjusted odds of adherence relative to natalizumab were significantly lower for all the other drugs, at 0.56 for IM interferon beta-1a, 0.43 for SC interferon beta-1b, 0.42 for glatiramer acetate, and 0.54 for SC interferon beta-1a. Furthermore, SC interferon beta-1b, glatiramer acetate, and SC interferon beta-1a had significantly higher regression-adjusted persistence failure ratios relative to natalizumab, at 1.27, 1.27, and 1.24, respectively.

In the switching analysis, 10.4% of patients taking natalizumab, 23.5% of those taking IM interferon beta-1a, 23.1% of those taking SC interferon beta-1b, 16.9% of those on glatiramer acetate, and 21.8% of those taking SC interferon beta-1a switched to a third drug. Regression-adjusted switching relative to natalizumab was significantly more likely for IM interferon beta-1a, SC interferon beta-1b, and SC interferon beta-1a, at 1.74, 1.77, and 1.62, respectively. “Switching between DMTs often indicates problems with tolerance or effectiveness,” the researchers noted.

—Jack Baney

Recommended Reading

Mesenchymal Stem Cells Show Promise in MS Treatment
ICYMI Multiple Sclerosis
An Effective Long-Term Treatment for Pseudobulbar Affect?
ICYMI Multiple Sclerosis
Oral Drug Reduces Relapse Rates in Multiple Sclerosis
ICYMI Multiple Sclerosis
News Roundup: New and Noteworthy Information
ICYMI Multiple Sclerosis
Is Migraine Associated With Multiple Sclerosis?
ICYMI Multiple Sclerosis
TIPS for Patients With MS
ICYMI Multiple Sclerosis
Literature Monitor
ICYMI Multiple Sclerosis
New Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Follow-Up of MS Using MRI
ICYMI Multiple Sclerosis
Conference News Update
ICYMI Multiple Sclerosis
Zeroing in on Tuberous Sclerosis Complex
ICYMI Multiple Sclerosis