From the Editor

Start offering aspirin to pregnant women at high risk for preeclampsia

Author and Disclosure Information

Aspirin 81 mg daily, initiated at 12 weeks of pregnancy, modestly reduces preeclampsia risk for women with multifetal gestation, chronic hypertension, type 1 or 2 diabetes, renal disease, autoimmune disease, or a history of preeclampsia


 

References

Obstetricians work diligently to anticipate, diagnose, and treat preeclampsia because the maternal and perinatal health burden of the disease is enormous. Many meta-analyses have reported that aspirin treatment of women at high risk for preeclampsia reduces the risk of developing the disease by about 10% to 23%.1–5 In addition, for women at high risk for preeclampsia, aspirin treatment reduces the risk of preterm birth and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). In your practice you should start offering aspirin to pregnant women at high risk for preeclampsia.

Aspirin reduces the risk of preeclampsia, preterm birth, and IUGRBased on the results of multiple meta-analyses of clinical trials involving more than 35,000 women, investigators consistently have concluded that aspirin treatment reduces the risk of preeclampsia in women at high risk for the disease.1–5 The magnitude of the effect is difficult to define with precision, but the risk reduction is likely in the range of 10% to 23%.1

In addition to reducing the risk of preeclampsia, aspirin also reduces the risk of 2 associated problems: preterm birth and IUGR. For preterm birth, the risk reduction is estimated to be in the range of 11% to 31%. For IUGR, the estimation for risk reduction is in the range of 7% to 24%.1 Although these benefits are modest, the burden of maternal and perinatal morbidity associated with preeclampsia is great, making even a modest benefit clinically significant.

Potential harms of aspirin treatmentIn the most recent meta-analysis from the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF),1 low-dose aspirin treatment was associated with no significant perinatal or maternal harms, but rare harms could not be ruled out. A small increase in the risk of placental abruption was noted, but this increase did not reach significance (relative risk [RR], 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93–1.48).1 There was no increased risk of maternal postpartum hemorrhage or blood loss at delivery.1 In one meta-analysis, aspirin treatment did not increase the risk of newborn intracranial hemorrhage.1

Other potential adverse effects of aspirin treatment include maternal gastrointestinal bleeding and exacerbation of respiratory disorders such as asthma, but these effects have not been reported as significant associations in clinical trials of preeclampsia prevention.

Dueling recommendations: Restrictive or liberal use of aspirin?The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommends use of aspirin to prevent preeclampsia in women who have a personal history of early-onset preeclampsia with delivery before 34 weeks of gestation and in women with preeclampsia in 2 or more prior pregnancies.6 The restrictive ACOG guideline recommends aspirin treatment for a very small group of women. In one analysis, using the ACOG guideline, only 0.35% of all pregnant women would be eligible for treatment with aspirin to prevent preeclampsia.7

The USPSTF recommends that all pregnant women with one major risk factor for preeclampsia—including multifetal gestation, chronic hypertension, type 1 or 2 pregestational diabetes, renal disease, autoimmune disease, or prior personal history of preeclampsia—receive treatment with aspirin to prevent preeclampsia.8 The Task Force also recommends that women with multiple moderate risk factors for preeclampsia, such as nulliparity, body mass index greater than 30 kg/m2, family history of preeclampsia in a mother or sister, age 35 years or older, and certain sociodemographic risk factors (African American race, low socioeconomic status) also be offered aspirin treatment.

The USPSTF guideline advises aspirin treatment for many women. According to one analysis, the USPSTFguideline would result in approximately 24% of all pregnant women being offered aspirin treatment.7

The USPSTF guideline would result in 67 times more pregnant women being treated with aspirin than the ACOG guideline. The narrowly focused ACOG recommendation is problematic because it recommends against aspirin treatment in women who are at very high risk for developing preeclampsia, for example, a 41-year-old woman in her first pregnancy with twins and pregestational diabetes. In addition, the ACOG recommendation is not consistent with the recommendations of most other major health organizations.

The World Health Organization,9 the United Kingdom’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE),10 and the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada11 all recommend aspirin treatment to prevent preeclampsia in pregnant women at high risk for the disease and utilize an expanded definition of “high risk” (TABLE). Some experts have observed that, in actual clinical practice, it is often difficult to consistently implement a prevention plan based on a complex assessment of clinical risk factors.7

An alternative to guidelines that use clinical risk factors to identify women at high risk is universal treatment. With universal treatment all pregnant women are prescribed aspirin, thereby maximizing the clinical benefit but unnecessarily treating many women with aspirin.7 Universal treatment of pregnant women with aspirin appears to be cost-effective and would be associated with annual health care savings of $365 million.7

Pages

Recommended Reading

Women with epilepsy conceive at normal rate
MDedge ObGyn
Thousands of DNA modifications seen in infants of smoking mothers
MDedge ObGyn
Shoulder dystocia: Taking the fear out of management
MDedge ObGyn
CDC issues guidance on worker precautions against Zika virus
MDedge ObGyn
The far-reaching implications of weight gain in pregnancy
MDedge ObGyn
Examining the fetal origins of obesity
MDedge ObGyn
FDA evaluating the use of oral fluconazole in pregnancy
MDedge ObGyn
CDC reports major drop in teen birth rates among minorities
MDedge ObGyn
Cardiovascular consequences of extreme prematurity persist into late adolescence
MDedge ObGyn
Stand up for research benefiting our patients, and more
MDedge ObGyn

Related Articles