Guidelines

USPSTF backs away from cotesting in cervical cancer screening


 

Women aged 30-65 years should be offered a choice between two cervical cancer screening methods, according to draft recommendations from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. The recommendations were released on Sept. 12.

Offering women aged 30-65 years a screening choice received an A recommendation. The draft retains the previous Task Force position and D recommendation against cervical cancer screening for certain groups, including women younger than 21 years, women aged 65 and older with a history of screening and a low risk of cervical cancer, and women who have had a hysterectomy.

Micrograph showing a low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion and benign endocervical mucosa. Nephron via Wikimedia Commons

Micrograph showing a low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion and benign endocervical mucosa.

The USPSTF based the draft recommendations in part on a review of four randomized, controlled trials of cotesting hrHPV and cytology that included more than 130,000 women.

“Modeling found that cotesting does not offer any benefit in terms of cancer reduction or life-years gained over hrHPV testing alone but increases the number of tests and procedures per each cancer case averted,” the Task Force members noted in the draft recommendation statement. “Therefore, the USPSTF concluded that there is convincing evidence that screening with either cytology alone or hrHPV testing alone provides substantial benefit and is preferable to cotesting” in otherwise healthy women aged 30-65 years.

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists currently recommends cotesting with cytology and HPV testing every 5 years or cytology alone every 3 years in women aged 30-65 years (Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128[4]:e111-30).

The USPSTF draft recommendations do not apply to women at increased risk for cervical cancer, including those with compromised immune systems or those who have cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3.

The draft recommendations are available online for public comment from Sept. 12 through Oct. 9, 2017, at the USPSTF website, www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org.

Recommended Reading

Are combination estrogen-progestin oral contraceptives associated with an increased risk of cancer?
MDedge ObGyn
Pelvic examination is essential to clinical care
MDedge ObGyn
Calls for respect for transgender patients
MDedge ObGyn
Appreciates treatment options for recurrent BV
MDedge ObGyn
Does HPV testing lead to improved diagnosis of cervical dysplasia for patients with ASC-US cytology?
MDedge ObGyn
2017 Update on female sexual dysfunction
MDedge ObGyn
Suture found in bladder after hysterectomy
MDedge ObGyn
For interstitial cystitis, restrictive diet pays off
MDedge ObGyn
Medical abortions provided via telemedicine appear safe
MDedge ObGyn
Radiofrequency devices appear to reduce vaginal laxity
MDedge ObGyn