Conference Coverage

Laparoscopic hysterectomy with obliterated cul-de-sac needs specialist care


 

REPORTING FROM THE AAGL GLOBAL CONGRESS

– When stage IV endometriosis with obliterated posterior cul-de-sac is discovered during laparoscopic hysterectomy, or suspected beforehand, women should be referred to a minimally invasive gynecologic surgery specialist because the procedure will be much more difficult, investigators said at the meeting sponsored by AAGL.

Dr. Alexandra Melnyk , a University of Pittsburgh ob.gyn resident M. Alexander Otto/MDedge News

Dr. Alexandra Melnyk

They reviewed 333 laparoscopic hysterectomies where endometriosis was discovered in the operating room. The disease is known to increase the complexity of hysterectomy; the investigators wanted to quantify the risk by endometriosis severity. Among their subjects, 237 women (71%) had stage I, II, or III endometriosis; 96 (29%) had stage IV disease, including 55 women (57%) with obliterated posterior cul-de-sacs.

Surgery was longer among stage IV cases (137 vs. 116 minutes), and there was greater blood loss; 66% of stage IV women required laparoscopic-modified radical hysterectomy versus about a quarter of women with stage I-III endometriosis.

Laparoscopic hysterectomy was even more complex when women with stage IV endometriosis had obliterated cul-de-sacs. A total of 93% required modified radical hysterectomies versus 29% of stage IV women with intact cul-de-sacs. Additional procedures were far more likely in this population, including salpingectomy, ureterolysis, enterolysis, cystoscopy, ureteral stenting, proctoscopy, bowel oversew, and anterior resection anastomosis. The differences all were statistically significant.

Among stage IV cases, mean operating time was longer in obliterated cul-de-sac cases (159 vs. 108 minutes), with higher blood loss, 100 mL versus 50 mL.

“Patients with obliterated cul-de-sacs identified intraoperatively should be referred to minimally invasive gynecologic surgeons because of the ... extra training required to safely perform [laparoscopic hysterectomy] with limited morbidity,” said lead investigator Alexandra Melnyk, MD, a University of Pittsburgh ob.gyn resident.

There was no industry funding and the investigators reported no disclosures.

SOURCE: Melnyk A et al. 2018 AAGL Global Congress, Abstract 81.

Recommended Reading

Is the use of a containment bag at minimally invasive hysterectomy or myomectomy effective at reducing tissue spillage?
MDedge ObGyn
Woman dies after robotic hysterectomy: $5M verdict
MDedge ObGyn
Suture found in bladder after hysterectomy
MDedge ObGyn
Technique for apical suspension at the time of total laparoscopic hysterectomy
MDedge ObGyn
What’s new in simulation training for hysterectomy
MDedge ObGyn
Basic technique of vaginal hysterectomy
MDedge ObGyn
Size can matter: Laparoscopic hysterectomy for the very large uterus
MDedge ObGyn
Laparoscopic suturing is an option
MDedge ObGyn
VTE risk after gynecologic surgery lower with laparoscopic procedures
MDedge ObGyn
Try to normalize albumin before laparoscopic hysterectomy
MDedge ObGyn