From the Editor

Can we return to the ABCs of crafting a medical record note?

Author and Disclosure Information

Medical record “note bloat” is adversely impacting communication among clinicians. It is time to refocus on the ABCs of note writing including accuracy, brevity, and clarity.


 

References

Prior to 1980, medical record notes were generally hand-written, short, and to the point. Senior physicians often wrote their 3-line notes using a fountain pen in an elegant cursive. With the transition to electronic medical records, notes have become bloated with irrelevant information and frequently lack a focus on the critical clinical insights that optimize patient care. The use of smart phrases to pull vast amounts of raw data into the note is a major contributor to note bloat. The unrestrained use of the copy and paste functionality generates a sequence of cloned notes that grow in length as new information is added and little information from prior notes removed. With each subsequent clone the note often becomes less accurate, lengthier, and more difficult for a reader to understand. In one survey of 253 physicians who wrote electronic notes, 90% reported that they used the copy and paste function, with 71% reporting that use of this function caused inconsistencies within and among notes and increased the repetitive presentation of outdated information in the note.1 Although the surveyed clinicians recognized that the copy and paste function caused problems, 80% reported that they planned to continue to use the copy and paste function.1

The SOAP note

The problem-oriented SOAP note is written in the classic structure of subjective and objective information, followed by an assessment and plan.2 The structure of the SOAP note emphasizes the logical and sequential collection of data followed by data analysis, resulting in a focused assessment and plan. When notes were hand-written and short, the entire SOAP note could be viewed on one page. Like a dashboard, the eye could quickly scan each key component of the note, facilitating the simultaneous integration of all 4 components of the note, facilitating understanding of the patient’s clinical situation. When the SOAP note structure is used to create a multipage electronic note, the result is a note that often confuses rather than enlightens the reader. A 5- to 10-page SOAP note is often useless for patient care but demonstrates the ability of computer-savvy clinicians to quickly generate a note thousands of words in length.

The APSO note, a response to note bloat

When a medical record note becomes a multipage document, clinicians should consider switching from the SOAP note structure to the APSO note, where the assessment and plan are at the top of the note, and the subjective and objective information is below the assessment and plan. The APSO format permits the reader to more quickly grasp the critical thinking of the author and facilitates a focus on key points relevant to the patient’s condition. The note can be written in the SOAP format, but then the assessment and plan are brought to the top of the note. In my clinical experience fewer than 10% of clinicians are using an APSO note structure. I believe that, with a multipage note, the APSO structure improves the experience of the reader and should be more widely utilized, especially by clinicians who are prone to crafting a bloated note. In a survey of more than 3,000 clinicians, approximately two-thirds of the respondents reported that, compared with SOAP notes, APSO notes were easier and faster to read, and APSO notes made it easier to follow the clinical reasoning of the author.3

Continue to: New evaluation and management billing guidelines—An opportunity to reduce note bloat...

Pages

Recommended Reading

Why aren’t more women doctors in the top-paying specialties?
MDedge ObGyn
Pandemic demand for NPs soars, softens for primary care: Report
MDedge ObGyn
Health care workers eager for COVID booster shots
MDedge ObGyn
Report urges complete residency overhaul
MDedge ObGyn
I did peer review: I saw turf wars, ego, and unfairness
MDedge ObGyn
Supreme Court Case: Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization: What you need to know
MDedge ObGyn
Fraudulent misbranding of PPE nets $22 million settlement
MDedge ObGyn
Greater portal use gives patients access, doctors headaches
MDedge ObGyn
Predicted pandemic retirement of many physicians hasn’t happened
MDedge ObGyn
New data illustrate pandemic pivot to telehealth by patients, physicians
MDedge ObGyn