Clinical Review

2023 Update on fertility

Author and Disclosure Information

A concise roundup on shifts in the total fertility rate, the new FIGO ovulatory disorders classification, and data on live birth rates with PGT-A


 

References

Total fertility rate and fertility care: Demographic shifts and changing demands

Vollset SE, Goren E, Yuan C-W, et al. Fertility, mortality, migration, and population scenarios for 195 countries and territories from 2017 to 2100: a forecasting analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 2020;396:1285-1306.

The total fertility rate (TFR) globally is decreasing rapidly, and in the United States it is now 1.8 births per woman, well below the required replacement rate of 2.1 that maintains the population.1 These reduced TFRs result in significant demographic shifts that affect the economy, workforce, society, health care needs, environment, and geopolitical standing of every country. These changes also will shift demands for the volume and type of services delivered by women’s health care clinicians.

In addition to the TFR, mortality rates and migration rates play essential roles in determining a country’s population.2 Anticipation and planning for these population and health care service changes by each country’s government, business, professionals, and other stakeholders are imperative to manage their impact and optimize quality of life.

Illustration: Kimberly Martens for OBG Management

US standings in projected population and economic growth

The US population is predicted to peak at 364 million in 2062 and decrease to 336 million in 2100, at which time it will be the fourth largest country in the world, according to a forecasting analysis by Vollset and colleagues.1 China is expected to become the biggest economy in the world in 2035, but this is predicted to change because of its decreasing population so that by 2098 the United States will again be the country with the largest economy (FIGURE 1).1

For the United States to maintain its economic and geopolitical standing, it is important to have policies that promote families. Other countries, especially in northern Europe, have implemented such policies. These include education of the population,economic incentives to create families, extended day care, and favorable tax policies.3 They also include increased access to family-forming fertility care. Such policies in Denmark have resulted in approximately 10% of all children being born from assisted reproductive technology (ART), compared with about 1.5% in the United States. Other countries have similar policies and success in increasing the number of children born from ART.

In the United States, the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM), RESOLVE: the National Infertility Association, the American Medical Women’s Association (AMWA), and others are promoting the need for increased access to fertility care and family-forming resources, primarily through family-forming benefits provided by companies.4 Such benefits are critical since the primary reason most people do not undergo fertility care is a lack of affordability. Only 1 person in 4 in the United States who needs fertility care receives treatment. Increased access would result in more babies being born to help address the reduced TFR.

Educational access, contraceptive goals, and access to fertility care

Continued trends in women’s educational attainment and access to contraception will hasten declines in the fertility rate and slow population growth (TABLE).1 These educational and contraceptive goals also must be pursued so that every person can achieve their individual reproductive life goals of having a family if and when they want to have a family. In addition to helping address the decreasing TFR, there is a fundamental right to found a family, as stated in the United Nations charter. It is a matter of social justice and equity that everyone who wants to have a family can access reproductive care on a nondiscriminatory basis when needed.

While the need for more and better insurance coverage for infertility has been well documented for many years, the decreasing TFR in the United States is an additional compelling reason that government, business, and other stakeholders should continue to increase access to fertility benefits and care. Women’s health care clinicians are encouraged to support these initiatives that also improve quality of life, equity, and social justice.

WHAT THIS EVIDENCE MEANS FOR PRACTICE
The decreasing global and US total fertility rate causes significant demographic changes, with major socioeconomic and health care consequences. The reduced TFR impacts women’s health care services, including the need for increased access to fertility care. Government and corporate policies, including those that improve access to fertility care, will help society adapt to these changes.

Continue to: A new comprehensive ovulatory disorders classification system developed by FIGO...

Pages

Recommended Reading

In utero exposure to asthma medication not tied to risks of neurodevelopmental disorders
MDedge ObGyn
Induced labor associated with poor school performance of offspring
MDedge ObGyn
Opioid overdose is an important cause of postpartum death
MDedge ObGyn
A love letter to Black birthing people from Black birth workers, midwives, and physicians
MDedge ObGyn
Forceps may help moms with obesity avoid cesareans
MDedge ObGyn
CarePostRoe.com: Study seeks to document poor quality medical care due to new abortion bans
MDedge ObGyn
New state bill could protect docs prescribing abortion pills to out-of-state patients
MDedge ObGyn
COVID led to rise in pregnancy-related deaths: New research
MDedge ObGyn
Advances in the treatment of fetal demise in the second and third trimester
MDedge ObGyn
COMMENT & CONTROVERSY
MDedge ObGyn