News

Two doses of HPV vaccine may be as effective as three

View on the News

Encouraging, but not ready for prime time

This study is the first to show preliminary evidence that a two-dose HPV vaccination regimen may provide protection as effective as that of the three-dose regimen. The findings are encouraging, but very preliminary, Dr. Jennifer Kahn and Dr. David L. Bernstein wrote in an editorial.

An effective two-dose regimen is a goal worthy of pursuing because many barriers prevent the fullest utilization of the HPV vaccine, wrote Dr. Kahn and Dr. Bernstein.

"These barriers include the high cost of vaccination and the many challenges associated with administration of a three-dose vaccine, especially given the lack of infrastructure for adolescent vaccination programs in many countries ... A two-dose series could lead to a substantial increase in the number of girls completing the vaccine series for the same cost, ensuring that greater numbers are protected."

The short-term equivalent immunogenicity demonstrated in the study indicates the potential for developing such a regimen and thus, reaching many more girls in their early adolescence – the time when they mount the most robust immune response. "However, and most important, antibody responses for HPV-18 at month 24 and HPV-6 at month 36 were significantly higher for girls who received three doses. This comparison of girls 9-13 years of age receiving two vs. three doses is important clinically, because girls in this age group are targeted for vaccination."

However, an amended regimen should also be tested in girls aged 13 and older, because, although younger girls are the primary vaccination target, many older girls are actually vaccinated.

"Depending on the results of these studies, clinical efficacy studies should be conducted to ensure that two doses of the ... vaccine are sufficient to prevent incident and persistent HPV infection, precancers (not only cervical but also anal, vaginal, and vulvar precancers), and anogenital warts, because the immunologic response that correlates with protection against HPV is unknown."

Males represent a big question mark in this entire equation, the authors noted.

"Studies of immunologic responses in men will also be important, because there is now a recommendation for men to receive the quadrivalent vaccine in the United States. If a two-dose series were immunogenic in men, cost-effectiveness estimates could become more favorable with respect to male vaccination, which in turn could alter vaccine recommendations for men. Also, if a two-dose schedule is recommended, consideration must be given to the possibility that a month 0 and 6 schedule may delay protection compared to a month 0, 1 to 2, and 6 schedule."

If these future studies do confirm a durable immune response from a two-dose schedule, the global impact could be significant, Dr. Kahn and Dr. Bernstein concluded.

"The potential to further reduce morbidity and mortality due to HPV-related cancers would be especially significant in less developed regions of the world, where the cost of vaccination and implementation of adolescent vaccination programs present significant barriers, but where primary prevention strategies are most urgently needed."

Dr. Kahn is an adolescent medicine expert in the department of pediatrics at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, and Dr. Bernstein is an infectious diseases expert in the department of pediatrics at the medical center. Dr. Kahn is on a grant review committee administered by the Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine (funded by Merck), which is funding projects designed to improve adolescent vaccination rates, and is cochair on clinical trials of the HPV vaccine in HIV-infected women and men funded by the National Institutes of Health, with Merck providing the vaccines. Dr. Bernstein receives speaking fees and royalties from GlaxoSmithKline for sales of a rotavirus vaccine.


 

FROM JAMA

Two doses of the human papillomavirus vaccine may be as effective as three in young adolescent girls, a postmarketing study suggests.

The immunogenic response of girls who got the two vaccines 6 months apart was just as good – if not better – than it was in girls and young women who had the traditional three-dose schedule, reported Dr. Simon R.M. Dobson and colleagues. The study was published in the May 1 issue of JAMA.

National Cancer Institute

Two doses of the human papillomavirus vaccine may be as effective as three in young adolescent girls, a postmarketing study published in JAMA suggests.

Longer and larger studies will be necessary before considering any change to the recommended regime, but an effective two-dose schedule could impart an enormous benefit in both developed and underdeveloped countries, Dr. Dobson said during a press briefing.

In Canada, about 40% of girls are not fully vaccinated; in the United States, that number reaches 80%, said Dr. Dobson of the University of British Columbia, Vancouver. Cost is probably part of the issue. A two-dose schedule could increase compliance considerably, he said.

In less-developed countries – including those without routine cervical cancer screening, where the need for protection is arguably greater – the HPV vaccine is less accessible. "The three-dose schedule might simply be out of range, but a two-dose schedule might make it accessible to many more women," he said.

This trial involved 830 subjects: 520 girls aged 9-13 years, who were randomized to a two- or three-dose schedule of the HPV quadrivalent vaccine, and 310 women aged 16-26 years, all of whom were vaccinated according to the three-dose schedule. The main endpoint was immunogenicity at 7 and up to 36 months after the last vaccine dose (JAMA 2013;309:1793-1802).

The mean titer antibody levels in girls who got the two-dose schedule were noninferior to those of the young women who had three doses: 7,344 mMU/mL for HPV-16 and 1,169 mMU/mL for HPV-18 vs. 3,545 mMU/mL for HPV-16 and 664 mMU/mL for HPV-18.

The investigators determined that the geometric mean titer ratios also were noninferior in the younger group compared with the older group: 2.07 for HPV-16 and 1.76 for HPV-18.

The results were similar for HPV-6 and HPV-11, Dr. Dobson and the coauthors reported. The younger girls who received doses had mean titer levels of 2,117 mMU/mL for HPV-6 and 2,339 for HPV-11, compared with 943 mMU/mL and 1,268 mMU/mL, respectively, for the women. The titer ratios also were noninferior.

The girls who received two doses also had noninferior GMT titers and ratios compared with girls who received three doses for all four vaccine genotypes. Girls receiving three doses had GMT levels of 7,736 for HPV-16, 1,730 for HPV-18, 1,876 for HPV-6, and 2,117 for HPV-11. Likewise, girls who received two doses vs. three doses had a noninferior antibody response for all four vaccine genotypes, with GMT ratios of 0.95 for HPV-16; 0.68 for HPV-18; 1.13 for HPV-6; and 1.10 for HPV-11.

Nearly all of the subjects (about 99%) remained seropositive for HPV-16, -6 and -11 until the end of the 36-month follow-up period.

At 24 months, HPV-18 seropositivity was seen in 89% of the girls who got two doses, 94% of the girls who got three doses, and 83% of the women who got three doses. This remained nearly unchanged for all three groups at 36 months.

Between 7 and 18 months, antibody levels for all four HPV genotypes declined and plateaued through the end of follow-up. "Both girls’ groups continued to maintain higher plateau levels of antibody at 36 months than women," Dr. Dobson said. However, there was some evidence that the two-dose group lost noninferiority for HPV-18 by 24 months, and HPV-6 by 36 months.

This finding does bring into question the durability of immune response in a two-dose vaccine schedule, Dr. Dobson said Antibody levels peaked at 7 months, then began to wane and plateaued at about 18 months, staying level until the end of the study. It’s still unclear how that waning level might impact protection; the same pattern is seen in young women who have gone through the entire three dose schedule.

"These young women have been followed for up to 10 years now, and the vaccine has remained 100% protective. There’s no magic antibody level below which we know protection fails. This vaccine is so good that there haven’t been enough vaccine failures to determine this," he said.

There’s already good evidence that societal protection is as important as individual protection, Dr. Dobson added at the press conference. "Studies in Australia [which has the largest vaccinated population] are showing protection from genital warts not only in women who are immunized, but in unimmunized men and unimmunized women as well. There’s a herd effect occurring – but we don’t know if two doses will have the same effect here as three doses do."

Pages

Recommended Reading

CDC: Binge drinking in women, girls under-recognized
MDedge ObGyn
Maternal H1N1 flu vaccine did not raise fetal mortality
MDedge ObGyn
ACOG recommends counseling for prenatal spina bifida surgery
MDedge ObGyn
Folic acid supplements linked to lower autism risk
MDedge ObGyn
Prevalence of repeat births in teens at 18.3% in 2010
MDedge ObGyn
Ruling allows all ages access to OTC emergency contraceptives
MDedge ObGyn
Prenatal exposure to air pollution boosts childhood cancer risk
MDedge ObGyn
Child neurodevelopment unaffected by exposure to multiple course of antenatal steroids
MDedge ObGyn
Autism, autism spectrum disorder risk increased with prenatal valproate exposure
MDedge ObGyn
Ovarian dermoid cysts recur in 11% of adolescents
MDedge ObGyn